Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Eysn0130/DeepLaw --skill deeplaw-verify-evidencegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Eysn0130/DeepLawWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eysn0130/deeplaw/deeplaw-verify-evidence)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eysn0130/deeplaw/deeplaw-verify-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eysn0130/deeplaw/deeplaw-verify-evidence/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eysn0130/deeplaw/deeplaw-verify-evidence"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eysn0130/deeplaw/deeplaw-verify-evidence.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00221 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00111 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
deeplaw-verify-evidence scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Verify DeepLaw Evidence
Use only after explicit invocation and with an exact admitted identity.
- Use
knowledge_supportoperation=sourcewithsource_action=get,fragment, ordifffor immutable source evidence; useoperation=verifyfor an exactasset_idorknowledge_id. - Select scope and maximum sensitivity explicitly. Check revision IDs, hashes, locators, lifecycle, source integrity, receipts, and freshness before relying on content.
- Stop on a failed or stale check. Preserve gaps and conflicts; never replace missing evidence with memory, ranking, Wiki text, or an unverified interpretation.
- Keep this workflow read-only. Do not mutate sources, elevate authority, or treat verification as legal adjudication.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 19 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 56cf329b6e17
deeplaw-verify-evidence is a skill published in the GitHub repository Eysn0130/DeepLaw (4 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 221 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
legal-citation-comprehensive
A Chinese and foreign legal-citation tool for checking, completing, explaining, and formatting footnotes under the second edition of a legal citation manual. It handles laws, cases, legal documents, and academic sources when the relevant source material is provided.
legal-fact-checker
A Chinese-language fact-checking guide for legal documents such as contracts, case analyses, legal opinions, and legal assignments. It checks provided drafts against factual and legal support without inventing laws, cases, or facts.
legal-research
A Chinese-language legal research workflow for finding laws, regulations, court cases, compensation standards, and legal grounds.
workflow-overview
A workflow guide for handling complex legal matters through assessment, issue identification, source research, reasoning, fact checking, and document output.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.