Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lawyerllsx-dotcom/Legal-Workflow-Chain --skill legal-researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lawyerllsx-dotcom/Legal-Workflow-ChainWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyerllsx-dotcom/legal-workflow-chain/legal-research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyerllsx-dotcom/legal-workflow-chain/legal-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawyerllsx-dotcom/legal-workflow-chain/legal-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lawyerllsx-dotcom/legal-workflow-chain/legal-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lawyerllsx-dotcom/legal-workflow-chain/legal-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.04149 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.02074 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00830 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00415 |
Grade A, and why
legal-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 300 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
法律检索助手
核心特色
- 支持用户身份识别（普通人/法学生/律师/法官检察官）
- 根据不同身份提供差异化服务
- 完整法源检索（法律/行政法规/司法解释/指导性案例/典型案例）
- 法条原文引用与条文互引梳理
核心触发条件（满足任一即触发）
高优先级（必须触发）：
- 明确要求查找法条/法规/司法解释/规范性文件
- 要求判断合法性/违法性（"违法吗""合法吗""有没有责任"）
- 要求查找赔偿标准/补偿金额/责任认定/程序要求
- 询问"根据什么法律""法律怎么规定""法律依据是什么"
中优先级（结合上下文触发）：
- "怎么办""怎么维权""能不能告"
- "需要什么手续""要具备什么条件"
- "还能主张什么""可以去哪里投诉"
适用场景
- 劳动争议：违法解除、经济补偿、工伤、社保、调岗等
- 合同纠纷：定金、违约金、违约责任、买卖合同等
- 侵权责任：交通事故、人身损害、医疗事故、环境污染等
- 婚姻家庭：离婚财产、子女抚养、房产继承等
- 行政/刑事/公司金融等
不触发情况（强制排除 —— 满足任一即不触发）
概念解释类（即使涉及法律术语也排除）：
- "什么是X""X是什么意思""X的概念""怎么理解X"——纯概念/名词解释
- "X和Y有什么区别"——概念辨析
- 示例："什么是善意取得？"→ 不触发；"善意取得的法条依据是什么？"→ 触发
其他排除：
- 仅要求推荐律师/法律服务
- 仅讨论法律新闻/案例故事（不涉及具体法规）
- 仅询问法律考试/学习问题（不涉及法条检索）
- 仅询问法律学习方法/法学理论（不要求检索具体法条）
判定原则：用户只想知道"XX是什么意思"而不要求查法条/案例/赔偿标准 → 不触发
与其他 skill 共存时的路由规则（2026-07-17 更新）
本 skill 设计时假设独立运行。当与以下 skill 共存时，触发条件自动收窄：
| 用户意图 | 本 skill | 应交由 |
|---|---|---|
| 核查已有草稿有没有编造法规/案例/事实 | ❌ 不触发 | legal-fact-checker |
| 诊断/补全/格式化脚注或引注 | ❌ 不触发 | legal-citation-comprehensive |
| 整理证据材料并填入证据目录模板 | ❌ 不触发 | evidence-catalog-generator |
| 保留格式编辑 .docx 文书 | ❌ 不触发 | docx-editing |
| 提取/识别案件争议焦点 | ❌ 不触发 | dispute-issue-identification |
| 三段论推理/涵摄分析（已有事实+法条） | ❌ 不触发 | deductive-reasoning |
| 法条竞合/规范冲突/证据矛盾的解决 | ❌ 不触发 | conflict-resolution |
判断口诀（agent 用）：
- 用户说"检索/查找/找法条/帮我查" → 本 skill
- 用户说"争议焦点是什么/分析争议" → dispute-issue-identification
- 用户说"三段论/推理/适用法条到事实" → deductive-reasoning
- 用户说"哪个法条优先/竞合/冲突/矛盾" → conflict-resolution
- 用户说"核查/检查/有没有编造/fact check" → legal-fact-checker
- 用户说"脚注/引注/引用格式/citation" → legal-citation-comprehensive
- 用户说"证据/证据目录/证据材料" → evidence-catalog-generator
- 用户说"编辑docx/修改文书格式/保留格式" → docx-editing
注意：本 skill 聚焦"从零检索"。检索完成后若用户还需要推理分析，应接力到 deductive-reasoning。若检索结果存在规范冲突，应接力到 conflict-resolution。
多 Skill 协作接力协议（2026-07-17 更新）
本 skill 完成检索后，必须检查用户请求是否还包含以下任务。若包含，在输出末尾追加接力标记，agent 会据此自动 invoke 下一个 skill。
接力前自检（输出接力标记前强制执行）
□ 接力目标是否在预期链中？（对照 CLAUDE.md 典型工作流链） □ "待办"字段是否包含了已检索到的法条索引，让下一个 skill 无需重复检索？ □ 本 skill 的核心任务（检索法条原文）是否确实已完成？
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/enterprise-compliance-risk-report.md 46 KB
- examples/report.md 7.5 KB
- examples/report2.md 6.7 KB
- examples/report3.md 8.9 KB
- references/alt-database-integration.md 9.7 KB
- use_database_by_api/config.json.example 160 B
- use_database_by_api/wolters_API_GUIDE.md 9.6 KB
- use_database_by_api/wolters_auto.py 14 KB runs code
- use_database_by_api/wolters_wrapper.py 821 B runs code
- use_database_by_api/wolterskluwer_searcher.py 24 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 300 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 926befc89564
legal-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository lawyerllsx-dotcom/Legal-Workflow-Chain (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 4,149 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
tw-legal-rag
A tool for finding real Taiwan court judgments and legal interpretations with verifiable citations before answering questions about Taiwan law.
legal-research
A legal research skill for finding and analysing laws and court cases, including similar cases. It requires access to a reliable legal research database before producing a formal report.
document-fill
A document-filling assistant that uses a supplied template and case files to fill in forms, contracts, or legal documents. It also reports where each filled value came from and which details are missing.
contract-review
A contract-review workflow for agreements governed by Chinese law, United States law, or both. It examines clauses one by one and produces a list of legal-risk questions, with an optional marked-up Word document.
legal-kb-builder
A tool for turning legal documents and other source material into a searchable local knowledge base. It supports sources such as PDF, DOCX, images, Markdown, and question-and-answer sets.
kr-patent-consistency-check
A Korean patent-document checker for comparing a patent specification, drawings, and claims—the sections that describe an invention and define its legal protection.