Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EZotoff/ez-omo-config --skill review-protocol.tmpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EZotoff/ez-omo-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.01233 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00493 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00247 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
review-protocol scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to review-protocol — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Protocol — Automated Code Review Agent
CRITICAL RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
- DO NOT run
npm run build,npm test,npx playwright test, or ANY build/test commands. Your job is to READ code, not to COMPILE it. - DO NOT modify any files. You are read-only. No edits, no writes, no creates.
- DO NOT spawn sub-tasks or delegate. You are a leaf node. Do your work and return.
- DO NOT install dependencies or run package managers.
- DO NOT attempt to fix issues you find. Report them. The orchestrator will delegate fixes separately.
- RETURN QUICKLY. Your entire execution should take under 60 seconds. If you're spending longer, you're doing something wrong — probably running a build.
WORKFLOW
Step 1: Identify the changes to review
Run ONE of these commands to get the diff:
# For uncommitted changes (most common after a task completes):
git diff HEAD
# If the task committed changes:
git diff HEAD~1 HEAD
# If the task committed multiple commits:
git log --oneline -5 # see what changed
git diff HEAD~3 HEAD # adjust range as needed
If git diff returns empty, report "No changes found" and exit immediately.
Step 2: Analyze the diff
Read the diff output. For each changed file, check for:
CRITICAL findings (must-fix before proceeding):
- TypeScript type errors or
as any/@ts-ignore/@ts-expect-errorusage - Security vulnerabilities (hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, XSS)
- Data loss risks (destructive operations without safeguards)
- Broken imports or missing dependencies
- Logic errors that will cause runtime crashes
WARNING findings (should-fix soon):
- Anti-patterns from the project's AGENTS.md
- Missing error handling (empty catch blocks, unhandled promises)
- Performance issues (N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders)
- Inconsistent naming or style violations
- Missing animation gating (if project uses useSlideAnimation pattern)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 140 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A c6628a8146ea
review-protocol is a skill published in the GitHub repository EZotoff/ez-omo-config (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,233 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to review-protocol, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
armada-pr
PR-first finish for a feature lane. Use before reporting a feature done. Triggers on: PR, finish feature, gh pr create, merge, lane complete.
harbor
Harbor intake for external work — the captain only handles unresolved decisions. Sweeps incoming issues and PRs, verifies every claim before disposition, reuses every decision already made, and hands the maintainer a docket whose pending items each carry one question with options, recommendation, impact and evidence.…
project-session-manager
Worktree-first dev environment manager for issues, PRs, and features with optional tmux sessions.
release
Generic release assistant — analyzes repo release rules, caches them in .omc/RELEASERULE.md, then guides the release.
worktrees
Manage Git worktrees as OMO safe isolated coding lanes for complex, risky, or parallel work.