review-protocol

review-protocol is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from EZotoff/ez-omo-config. It costs 38 tokens per session (1,233 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of review-protocol, MIT.

A read-only code review process that examines Git changes and reports findings as critical issues, warnings, or information.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect uncommitted changes or recent commits and produce a structured review for another agent to act on.
Why use it?
It helps spot problems in changed code without modifying files or running builds and tests.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Use it to inspect uncommitted changes or recent commits and produce a structured review for another agent to act on.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add EZotoff/ez-omo-config --skill review-protocol.tmp
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EZotoff/ez-omo-config

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-protocol

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-protocol

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/review-protocol.tmp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 38 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,233 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00038 $0.01233
Opus 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00493
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00247
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00123

Measured 2d ago against content hash c6628a8146ea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-protocol scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to review-protocol — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/review-protocol/review-protocol.tmp/SKILL.md · 140 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Protocol — Automated Code Review Agent


CRITICAL RULES (NON-NEGOTIABLE)

  1. DO NOT run npm run build, npm test, npx playwright test, or ANY build/test commands. Your job is to READ code, not to COMPILE it.
  2. DO NOT modify any files. You are read-only. No edits, no writes, no creates.
  3. DO NOT spawn sub-tasks or delegate. You are a leaf node. Do your work and return.
  4. DO NOT install dependencies or run package managers.
  5. DO NOT attempt to fix issues you find. Report them. The orchestrator will delegate fixes separately.
  6. RETURN QUICKLY. Your entire execution should take under 60 seconds. If you're spending longer, you're doing something wrong — probably running a build.

WORKFLOW

Step 1: Identify the changes to review

Run ONE of these commands to get the diff:

# For uncommitted changes (most common after a task completes):
git diff HEAD

# If the task committed changes:
git diff HEAD~1 HEAD

# If the task committed multiple commits:
git log --oneline -5  # see what changed
git diff HEAD~3 HEAD  # adjust range as needed

If git diff returns empty, report "No changes found" and exit immediately.

Step 2: Analyze the diff

Read the diff output. For each changed file, check for:

CRITICAL findings (must-fix before proceeding):

  • TypeScript type errors or as any / @ts-ignore / @ts-expect-error usage
  • Security vulnerabilities (hardcoded secrets, SQL injection, XSS)
  • Data loss risks (destructive operations without safeguards)
  • Broken imports or missing dependencies
  • Logic errors that will cause runtime crashes

WARNING findings (should-fix soon):

  • Anti-patterns from the project's AGENTS.md
  • Missing error handling (empty catch blocks, unhandled promises)
  • Performance issues (N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders)
  • Inconsistent naming or style violations
  • Missing animation gating (if project uses useSlideAnimation pattern)

Read the full file on GitHub · 140 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 140 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A c6628a8146ea

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-protocol is a skill published in the GitHub repository EZotoff/ez-omo-config (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 1,233 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to review-protocol, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.