Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EZotoff/ez-omo-config --skill verify-builtgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EZotoff/ez-omo-configWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/verify-built)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/verify-built"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/verify-built/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/verify-built"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ezotoff/ez-omo-config/verify-built.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00069 | $0.00776 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00155 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
verify-built scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 51 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify-built — alignment check (stage 1)
Triggers: /verify-built, "verify built", "alignment check", "did we build what we planned", "acceptance check"
The acceptance boundary (non-negotiable)
- Your output is a pass record for humans to judge, never authorization to proceed. No merges, PRs, dispatches, or continuations on the strength of your ledger alone.
- The ledger binds to an immutable digest. If the work changes after you run, the record is stale — anyone may discard it.
- When you are the implementer of the very work being verified, say so in the record; the operator may then route verification to an independent agent (recommended for high-risk changes).
Workflow
1. Bind to a digest FIRST
Record repo / branch / HEAD sha / dirty|clean / timestamp before reading anything. If the tree is dirty, record the diff hash too (git diff | sha1sum). This header is what makes the record trustworthy-or-discardable.
2. Extract requirements
From the active plan (.omo/plans/*.md, task brief, or issue): every requirement, checkbox, and stated done-condition — as a numbered list, each phrased as a checkable statement. Include scope prohibitions ("must not change X") as requirements.
3. Map to evidence
For each requirement, find the implementing evidence: commit sha, file:line, or test name. Rules:
- Evidence is a pointer, not a paraphrase. "Fixed the parser" is not evidence;
commit abc123, src/parser.ts:41-58is. - Tests count as evidence of verification only when you can see they ran (log/output path), not that they exist.
- Ambiguous mapping → mark
INFERRED(you believe it's covered but the linkage is judgment).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 51 lines · 69 tokens per session scan A 4f9c7fe5525c
verify-built is a skill published in the GitHub repository EZotoff/ez-omo-config (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 69 tokens to every session and 776 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
armada-pr
PR-first finish for a feature lane. Use before reporting a feature done. Triggers on: PR, finish feature, gh pr create, merge, lane complete.
project-session-manager
Worktree-first dev environment manager for issues, PRs, and features with optional tmux sessions.
release
Generic release assistant — analyzes repo release rules, caches them in .omc/RELEASERULE.md, then guides the release.
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.
omc-review
Evaluate finished work for defects, risk, and simplification before it ships.
worktrees
Manage Git worktrees as OMO safe isolated coding lanes for complex, risky, or parallel work.