Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fabb/WigAI. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fabb/WigAI/main/.claude/skills/bmad-editorial-review-prose/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabb/WigAIWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabb/wigai/bmad-editorial-review-prose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabb/wigai/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabb/wigai/bmad-editorial-review-prose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabb/wigai/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabb/wigai/bmad-editorial-review-prose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01108 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00443 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-editorial-review-prose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose — 84 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Editorial Review - Prose
Goal: Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.
Your Role: You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
CONTENT IS SACROSANCT: Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.
Inputs:
- content (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)
- style_guide (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.
- reader_type (optional, default:
humans) —humansfor standard editorial,llmfor precision focus
PRINCIPLES
- Minimal intervention: Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity
- Preserve structure: Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure
- Skip code/markup: Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup
- When uncertain: Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change
- Deduplicate: Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed
- No conflicts: Merge overlapping fixes into single entries
- Respect author voice: Preserve intentional stylistic choices
STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE: If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A b3687fe80567
bmad-editorial-review-prose is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabb/WigAI (62 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,108 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose, differing in 84 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
debug-optimize-lcp
Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions…
opik-diagnose
Surface the Opik traces worth a developer's attention, ranked by signal — Diagnostics issues first, then errors, failed tool calls, latency, regressions, and low online-eval scores. With the Opik MCP connected it lists the project's agentinsightsissue entities, offers to turn Diagnostics on when the project has it…
ue-mcp-epic-routing
Use when deciding between ue-mcp's native category actions and Epic's wrapped ToolsetRegistry tools (the epic actions, incl. the Blueprint graph DSL) for a task in Unreal. Pulls in when authoring Blueprint graph bodies, or any time both a native action and an epic action could do the job and you need to pick.
qa-knowledge
To run QA engineering — requirements/gap analysis, scenario & spec design, test implementation, failure triage — over the QA knowledge base.
frontmcp-setup
Use when starting, scaffolding, or organizing a FrontMCP project. Covers creating a new project (CLI scaffold or manual) for Node, Vercel, and other targets; standalone versus Nx-monorepo layout, naming conventions, generators, and dependency rules; composing multiple @App classes, ESM packages, and remote MCP servers…
x-use-review
Daily digest for an x-use account covering health, metrics, pending drafts, and queued work in one pass, then approve/reject/process per the user's direction. Use for "how is my account doing", daily check-ins, or before any batch of approvals.