Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabiandistler/agents --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabiandistler/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabiandistler/agents/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabiandistler/agents/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00094 | $0.01521 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00038 | $0.00608 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00304 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00152 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · +2 lines 09eb147f793e
- 28d ago First seen · 88 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A 47f4e52c2169
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabiandistler/agents (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 1,521 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
Other skills, from other repositories
scale-to-millions
Use this skill whenever the user is designing, reviewing, debugging, or answering interview questions about system/software architecture and scalability — e.g. "scale my app", "how do I handle more traffic", "design a URL shortener / news feed / chat system", "my API is slow under load", "should I shard my database"…
drupal-security-review
Use when auditing Drupal 11 custom modules/themes for security issues such as unsafe input handling, XSS risks, SQL injection, and access control gaps.
dry
DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) review rules for code reviews: find the same knowledge — a rule, a constant, a parser, a validation, a protocol detail — implemented in several places that must change together, and tell it apart from code that merely looks alike. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes…
solid
SOLID design review rules (SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, DIP) for code reviews: what counts as a real design finding, what is only taste, how to cite it and how severe it is. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes for design problems, when asked for a "SOLID review", "design review", "is this class doing…
rigorous-review
Rigorous, evidence-backed code review for high-stakes changes. Trigger on: rigorous review, thorough review, deep review, review this PR properly, review before merge, high-stakes review, "is this actually safe to merge", regulated or compliance code review, batch-review these PRs. Every finding carries quoted…
speckit.quizme
Logic Challenger (Red Team) - Ask critical questions, find edge cases.