solid

solid is a skill for Claude Code from siva01c/claude-plugins. It costs 113 tokens per session (912 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of rules for reviewing software designs using the SOLID principles. SOLID is a group of guidelines about keeping code responsibilities clear and making changes and testing easier.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing changed code, a diff, or a pull request for issues such as mixed responsibilities, repeated change points, or hard-to-test units.
Why use it?
It helps separate design problems that cause real maintenance costs from personal style preferences. It also explains how to describe and rate a finding.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Part of the quality-tools plugin — 2 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when reviewing changed code, a diff, or a pull request for issues such as mixed responsibilities, repeated change points, or hard-to-test units.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add siva01c/claude-plugins --skill solid
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/siva01c/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install quality-tools, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for solid

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for solid

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/siva01c/claude-plugins/solid.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 113 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 912 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00113 $0.00912
Opus 5.5 $0.00045 $0.00365
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00023 $0.00182
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00091

Measured 17d ago against content hash 91ff48dc814a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

solid scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

quality-tools/skills/solid/SKILL.md · 85 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SOLID Review

A design finding is worth reporting only when the design already costs something or will on the next ordinary change — a bug, an inconsistency, a change that has to touch many places, a unit that cannot be tested. Style, naming taste, "could be more elegant" and textbook purity are never findings.

Scope

Review the changed code and what it calls, read whole — not only the diff hunks. Judge the change against the conventions the repository already follows (its AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, existing seams and patterns). A repo that keeps small scripts procedural is not violating SOLID by doing so.

Rules

SRP — Single Responsibility

One unit (function, class, module, service) has to change for two unrelated reasons. Name both reasons in the finding.

  • Finding: an HTTP controller that validates input, builds SQL, renders e-mail and spawns a child process; a Drupal form submit handler that also syncs to a remote API.
  • Not a finding: a long function that does one thing in several steps.

OCP — Open/Closed

Adding the next variant (a check, a backend, a provider, a content type) requires editing a switch/if chain in several places instead of one registration point (a map, a plugin type, a tagged service, an event subscriber).

  • Cite every place the next variant would have to touch.
  • Not a finding: a single match in one place that is the registration point.

LSP — Liskov Substitution

An implementation that throws, no-ops or silently changes meaning for part of the contract it claims, so that callers must know which concrete class they have (instanceof checks, "not supported" exceptions, a subclass that ignores an argument).

ISP — Interface Segregation

Callers are forced to depend on methods they never use, or implementers must stub out half an interface. Cite the unused methods and the stubbing implementers.

DIP — Dependency Inversion

Business logic hard-wired to a concrete I/O dependency (network, filesystem, database, clock, child process, a static \Drupal::service() call inside a class that supports injection) so that it cannot be tested or swapped without it — where the codebase already has a seam for that dependency elsewhere (DI container, an injected client, a clock service). Without an existing seam, report it only if it already blocks a test the change needs.

Read the full file on GitHub · 85 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 17d ago First seen · 85 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A 91ff48dc814a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

solid is a skill published in the GitHub repository siva01c/claude-plugins (16 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 912 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-27.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

rubber-duck

Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work…

jim60105/copilot-prompt · 118 tokens

code-review-checklist

Genera un checklist de revisión de código personalizado para cualquier pull request basado en el lenguaje, tipo de cambio y nivel de riesgo. Úsalo cuando te pidan revisar código, verificar un PR, revisar un pull request o generar un checklist de revisión de código. Produce un checklist enfocado con verificaciones…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 88 tokens

best-practices

Apply modern web development best practices for security, compatibility, and code quality. Use when asked to "apply best practices", "security audit", "modernize code", "code quality review", or "check for vulnerabilities".

addyosmani/web-quality-skills · 49 tokens

pr-description-writer

Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 80 tokens

resolve-pr-comments

Evaluate, fix, answer, and reply to GitHub pull request review comments and conversation comments. Handles both change requests (fix or skip) and reviewer questions (explain using the rationale recalled from past Claude Code transcripts). Use when the user asks to "resolve PR comments", "fix review comments", "address…

tobihagemann/turbo · 96 tokens

review-code

Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, API misuse, consistency issues, simplicity problems, or test coverage gaps and low-value tests by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Single-concern with a type argument, or full review with no argument. Use when the…

tobihagemann/turbo · 153 tokens