Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall --skill opt-in-workspace-writesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_MallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/opt-in-workspace-writes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/opt-in-workspace-writes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/opt-in-workspace-writes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/opt-in-workspace-writes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fabioc-aloha/alex_skill_mall/opt-in-workspace-writes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00276 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
opt-in-workspace-writes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Opt-In for Workspace Writes
The Problem
Extensions/tools that auto-write to user workspaces without consent:
- Create
.vscode/folders unexpectedly - Add config files that get committed accidentally
- Scaffold structures the user didn't want
- Violate the principle of least surprise
The Solution
Get explicit consent before any workspace mutation.
1. Ask First
const choice = await vscode.window.showInformationMessage(
'Initialize Alex configuration in this workspace?',
{ modal: true },
'Yes, create .github/',
'No, skip'
);
if (choice !== 'Yes, create .github/') {
return; // User declined, do nothing
}
2. Show What Will Be Created
const files = [
'.github/copilot-instructions.md',
'.github/config/settings.json'
];
const choice = await vscode.window.showInformationMessage(
`This will create ${files.length} files:\n${files.join('\n')}`,
{ modal: true, detail: files.join('\n') },
'Create Files',
'Cancel'
);
3. Provide Undo/Remove
// After creating files
vscode.window.showInformationMessage(
'Configuration created.',
'Undo'
).then(selection => {
if (selection === 'Undo') {
// Delete the created files
files.forEach(f => fs.unlinkSync(path.join(workspaceRoot, f)));
}
});
Never Auto-Write These
| Path | Why It's Dangerous |
|---|---|
.vscode/ |
Shared via git, affects all developers |
.github/ |
Shared via git, affects CI/CD |
package.json |
Changes dependencies/scripts |
.gitignore |
Affects what's tracked |
| Root config files | .eslintrc, tsconfig.json, etc. |
Acceptable Auto-Behavior
- Reading files (no consent needed)
- Writing to temp directories
- Writing to user-global config (already your data)
- Writing to extension storage area
Verification
- Fresh install → no files created until user opts in
- User can decline and extension still works
- Created files are clearly attributed to the extension
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 100 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 7bb19c868ad0
opt-in-workspace-writes is a skill published in the GitHub repository fabioc-aloha/Alex_Skill_Mall (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 552 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
apply-trust-building
Use when a manager is new to a team, has experienced a trust breach, or wants to deliberately strengthen the trust foundation of their management relationships — because trust determines whether employees share real problems, follow direction with confidence, and engage fully.
design-team-meeting-structure
Use when a team's meetings feel like the wrong type of conversation for the decisions being made, when meetings are too frequent or too infrequent, or when team members feel their time is wasted — to design the right meeting types, cadences, and facilitation practices for how the team actually works.
prevent-employee-burnout
Use when a manager wants to reduce the risk of burnout on their team, or when they observe signs that a direct report may be approaching burnout — to identify contributing factors and intervene before the employee becomes disengaged, impaired, or leaves.
run-underperformance-conversation
Use when a manager first observes that a direct report's performance is declining or falling below expectations — to have an early, direct, non-punitive conversation that names the gap and opens a path to correction before the situation requires formal process.
apply-distributed-team-practices
Use when managing a team where members work in different locations, time zones, or on hybrid schedules — to adapt management practices so remote members have equal access to information, relationships, and advancement opportunities as in-office members.
give-employee-recognition
Use when a manager wants to acknowledge a direct report's specific contribution, achievement, or behavior in a way that reinforces it and builds engagement — separate from compensation and formal performance reviews.