Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add famzila/agent-skills-set --skill angular-lintersgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/famzila/agent-skills-setWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/famzila/agent-skills-set/angular-linters)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/famzila/agent-skills-set/angular-linters"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/famzila/agent-skills-set/angular-linters/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/famzila/agent-skills-set/angular-linters"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/famzila/agent-skills-set/angular-linters.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02700 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01080 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00540 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
angular-linters scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/eslint-config-template.md 4.1 KB
- references/import-x-and-unused-imports.md 5.4 KB
- references/parser-config.md 2.1 KB
- references/prettier.md 3.1 KB
- references/rxjs.md 4.3 KB
- references/stylelint.md 2.5 KB
- references/validation-testing.md 6.7 KB
- scripts/configure_linters.sh 7.4 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A ec6ccb914df8
angular-linters is a skill published in the GitHub repository famzila/agent-skills-set (3 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,700 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-animations
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
ring:validating-ux-completeness
Validating that UX specifications are complete before technical design: a read-only checklist over wireframes, states, responsive behavior, accessibility, and component-library alignment, emitting a DESIGN VALIDATED / NEEDS REVISION verdict to design-validation.md. Standalone utility — run after a product-designer…
a11y-audit
Run a Maestro-style accessibility audit for WCAG compliance, ARIA usage, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility.
seo-audit
Run a Maestro-style SEO assessment for meta tags, structured data, crawlability, and Core Web Vitals.
generic-static-code-reviewer
Review static site code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces pure HTML/CSS/JS standards, minimal page weight, mobile-first design. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing changes.
web-standards-reviewer
Review an existing web project for web-standards use and essential dependencies only, against the rules of /web-conventions, /javascript-conventions, and the stack skill the project composes (web-static, web-sprinkles, web-components), and answer with the shortest possible feedback — one line per finding, one line…