Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare --skill cis-controls-ngfw-compliancegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshareWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/cis-controls-ngfw-compliance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/cis-controls-ngfw-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/cis-controls-ngfw-compliance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/cis-controls-ngfw-compliance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/cis-controls-ngfw-compliance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.03074 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01537 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00615 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00307 |
Grade A, and why
cis-controls-ngfw-compliance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 206 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CIS Controls NGFW Compliance Research
Overview
Use this skill to answer questions like “how should my firewall support CIS Controls v8?” or “is this NGFW design aligned with CIS Critical Security Controls?” The core answer is: an NGFW is not “CIS compliant” by itself. CIS Controls alignment is assessed across the organization’s implemented safeguards, processes, assets, people, evidence, and operating practices. A firewall estate can be a major technical control and evidence source, but it must be configured, monitored, reviewed, maintained, and tied to the organization’s CIS implementation group, risk, and operational context.
The CIS Controls are prioritized cyber defense practices. They are useful as a practical baseline even when the organization is not pursuing a formal regulatory certification. For firewall work, most directly relevant are Controls 3-8, 10-13, 15, 17, and 18 (see references/control-mapping.md). CIS Controls v8.1 (June 2024) is an iterative refresh of v8 that preserves the Control/Safeguard numbering while adding a Governance security function aligned to NIST CSF 2.0; confirm which version the organization uses.
Treat this as security-control assessment guidance, not legal advice and not a certification claim. When producing final language, cite CIS Control and Safeguard IDs where known, label assumptions, and distinguish “supports CIS Controls” from “fully implemented across the enterprise.”
Scope and routing
Parse raw configurations with the matching parsing-* skill first. Use this skill when findings must map to CIS Controls safeguards and evidence; use firewall-best-practices-audit for framework-neutral hygiene. Keep CIS Controls distinct from product-specific CIS Benchmarks.
Runtime intake
Before starting the workflow, inspect the request, supplied artifacts, and
available approved read-only evidence. If unresolved facts could materially
change safety, scope, correctness, confidence, or the requested output, read
references/runtime-intake.md.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 206 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 435a5ef6919e
cis-controls-ngfw-compliance is a skill published in the GitHub repository fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare (9 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 3,074 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
fmc-firewall-ops
Cisco Secure Firewall FMC — access policy search, rule inspection, FTD device targeting, multi-FMC profile management. Use when searching firewall rules by IP or FQDN, checking if host A can reach host B through the firewall, auditing FMC access policies, or reviewing SGT-based segmentation rules.
fortianalyzer-ops
FortiAnalyzer log operations — policy-filtered traffic log query within a bounded time window, offset pagination, per-policy activity checks, and logging-device inventory. Use when asking whether traffic actually matched a firewall rule, investigating what hit a policy, or determining whether a rule is genuinely…
fortigate-ops
FortiGate device operations — system status, interfaces, routing, IPsec VPN tunnel state with phase 1 and phase 2 reported separately, HA member identification, per-VDOM scoping, and manager-vs-device drift detection. Use when asking what a FortiGate is ACTUALLY doing right now, whether a tunnel is up, or whether the…
fortimanager-ops
FortiManager policy operations — ADOM inventory, policy package review, recursive object resolution, revision history, install preview, and gated package install. Use when auditing FortiGate firewall policy at the MANAGER level (intent), reviewing ADOM policy packages, or planning a package install with rollback…
meraki-security-appliance
Cisco Meraki MX security appliance (read-only) — L3/L7 firewall rules, content filtering, IDS/IPS and AMP settings, site-to-site VPN, traffic shaping via Cisco's official Meraki MCP. Use when auditing Meraki firewall rules, reviewing content filtering, or inspecting MX VPN configuration.
radkit-remote-access
Cisco RADKit — cloud-relayed remote device access, CLI execution, SNMP polling, device inventory discovery, attribute inspection. Use when accessing remote network devices through a cloud relay, running CLI on air-gapped devices, polling SNMP metrics remotely, or discovering device inventory via RADKit.