Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fatihguner/foreman --skill situational-leadershipgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fatihguner/foremanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/situational-leadership)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/situational-leadership"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fatihguner/foreman/situational-leadership/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fatihguner/foreman/situational-leadership"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fatihguner/foreman/situational-leadership.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.03219 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.01610 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00644 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00322 |
Grade A, and why
situational-leadership scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Read runtime and advisory rules before applying this skill. Other Foreman layers and the catalog are in ../../content/, relative to this SKILL.md.
Situational Leadership
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, he ran the company with iron-fisted directiveness -- killing product lines, overruling engineers, and making unilateral decisions that saved the company from bankruptcy. A decade later, leading the team that created the iPhone, the same Steve Jobs operated differently: setting the vision, then stepping back to let Jony Ive, Scott Forstall, and their teams execute with extraordinary autonomy. Same leader. Radically different style. The conventional explanation is that Jobs "mellowed." The more precise explanation is that he -- consciously or not -- matched his leadership approach to the situation. Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard formalized this instinct into Situational Leadership Theory, arguing that there is no single best leadership style. There is only the right style for this person, on this task, at this moment. Leaders who refuse to adapt do not fail because they are bad leaders. They fail because they are inflexible ones.
The Framework
Situational Leadership maps two variables against each other in a 2x2 matrix: the leader's behavior (task-oriented vs. relationship-oriented) and the follower's development level (competence vs. commitment). The result is four leadership styles, each appropriate for a specific combination of follower readiness.
The 2x2 Matrix
TASK BEHAVIOR (Directive)
Low High
+-----------------+-------------------+
High | S3: | S2: |
| SUPPORTING | COACHING |
RELATIONSHIP | | |
BEHAVIOR | High rel, | High task, |
(Supportive) | Low task | High rel |
+-----------------+-------------------+
Low | S4: | S1: |
| DELEGATING | DIRECTING |
| | |
| Low rel, | High task, |
| Low task | Low rel |
+-----------------+-------------------+
Applied to follower development:
D1 (Low competence, High commitment) --> S1: DIRECTING
D2 (Some competence, Low commitment) --> S2: COACHING
D3 (High competence, Variable commit) --> S3: SUPPORTING
D4 (High competence, High commitment) --> S4: DELEGATING
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 184 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A e5677cc9044b
situational-leadership is a skill published in the GitHub repository fatihguner/foreman (50 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 3,219 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
manager-as-coach
A management approach in which managers help people do their best work instead of only supervising them. It focuses on using strengths, removing obstacles, setting clear expectations, giving recognition, and keeping teams small.
one-on-one-prep
Prep structured 1:1 agendas with deal review, metrics, coaching moments, and follow-up.
apply-situational-leadership
Use when a manager needs to determine how much direction vs. support to give a specific direct report on a specific task — because the same management approach applied uniformly produces over-management of high performers and under-support of developing employees.
apply-enabling-structure
Use when building or leading a team, organization, or system — to create the conditions, remove the obstacles, and design the structures that let people execute with high autonomy, rather than directing through control, because the best leaders are barely visible in their teams' day-to-day success.
apply-managerial-leverage
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual…
run-one-on-one-meeting
Use when preparing for or facilitating a regular manager-to-direct-report one-on-one meeting to build trust, surface blockers, and develop the employee.