Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ace3000chao/book2startup --skill leadership-triplegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ace3000chao/book2startupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/leadership-triple)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/leadership-triple"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/leadership-triple/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/leadership-triple"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/leadership-triple.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00128 | $0.02466 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00064 | $0.01233 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00493 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00247 |
Grade A, and why
leadership-triple scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Leadership Triple（领导力三要素）
R — 原文 (Reading)
"The challenges exist within the organization can be traced to the cohesion of the executive team and its capabilities in prediction, delegation, and repetition."
— Verne Harnish, Scaling Up, 第2章 Barriers
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
Scaling的内部障碍可以归结为高管团队的三个核心能力的缺失：
1. 预测（Prediction） CEO必须能洞察市场趋势和客户需求的方向。预测不是算命，而是基于数据洞察和经验判断形成的"市场嗅觉"。预测不足 → 战略与市场需求脱节 → 产品/服务卖不出去。
2. 授权（Delegation） CEO必须把责任和权力同时下放，不是"让团队干活"而是"让团队做主"。授权不足 → 所有决策瓶颈在顶层 → CEO成为全公司最大的单点故障。关键不是放权本身，而是放权+追踪结果，而非放权+微观管理。
3. 重复（Repetition） 战略、价值观、优先级的传达必须通过足够多的重复才能内化为组织行为。重复不是啰嗦，而是确保信息一致性和渗透力。重复不足 → 信息衰减 → 各部门各行其是 → 战略执行走形。
三者关系：
- 预测是战略的前端（做正确的事）
- 授权是执行的中端（正确的人做正确的事）
- 重复是传播的后端（让正确的事持续被做）
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例 1: 某零售连锁企业的"预测失灵"
- 问题: CEO凭直觉判断消费趋势，连续两季选品失误，库存积压严重
- 方法论的使用: 引入月度"市场信号审视会"，用3个关键指标（客群变化、竞品动态、社交媒体情绪）替代直觉判断
- 结论: 预测能力的缺失被授权和重复放大——即便CEO预测对了，由于没有系统化传导机制，团队也没执行到位
- 结果: 季度选品准确率从48%提升至71%
案例 2: 某SaaS公司CEO的"授权陷阱"
- 问题: CEO每天工作14小时，所有产品决策都要他点头，公司增长到50人后开始出现严重瓶颈
- 方法论的使用: 实施"决策层级地图"——将决策按影响范围和可逆性分为7级，明确哪级CEO保留、哪级VP决定、哪级一线决定
- 结论: 授权不足的根源是CEO不信任团队，信任的建立需要时间和系统
- 结果: CEO日均工作时长从14小时降至9小时，产品迭代速度提升2倍
案例 3: 某制造业高管的"重复不够"
- 问题: 推行新Core Values，半年后调查发现85%的一线员工说不出三条Core Values
- 方法论的使用: 强制"价值观晨会嵌入式"——每天班前3分钟讲一个Core Values故事，每周周例会第一个议题复盘"本周哪件事体现了X价值观"
- 结论: Core Values不重复传达等于没有，重复不是形式主义，是内化的必要条件
- 结果: 6个月后Core Values认知度从15%提升至78%
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个 skill?
- CEO/高管忙到分身乏术但公司问题越来越多 — 典型授权不足症状，CEO成了全公司最忙的人
- 战略决策总与市场需求错位 — CEO拍脑袋决策，没有系统的市场信号收集机制
- 战略在传达中层层衰减，到执行层已走形 — 战略会议开完就完，团队并不真正理解或记住
- 高管团队表面和气但实质上各干各的 — Cohesion缺失，预测/授权/重复三个能力均不足
- 公司发展到一定规模后突然出现系统性混乱 — 从创业期"人治"过渡到"法治"时的领导力断层
语言信号 (用户的话里出现这些就应激活)
- "为什么我做了这么多团队还是跑偏"
- "感觉团队不听我的"
- "我比谁都忙但公司还是出问题"
- "战略定得很好但执行不下去"
- "开了很多会但大家好像还是各干各的"
- "不知道市场下一步会怎么变"
- "放权给他们不放心"
与相邻 skill 的区分
- 与
dumbest-in-room的区别:dumbest-in-room聚焦于CEO"愿意被超越"的心态，是授权不足的认知根源之一；本skill是三维度诊断框架，覆盖授权但不限于心态问题。 - 与
coaching-returns的区别:coaching-returns聚焦于"一流人才需要教练"，是解决领导力成长的路径之一；本skill从组织障碍层面诊断三要素，三者都弱才会触发本skill。 - 与
routine-sets-you-free的区别:routine-sets-you-free聚焦于习惯的执行机制；本skill中的"重复"与其有交集但范围更广——本skill的"重复"是战略层面的信息渗透，routine-sets-you-free是个人行为层面的习惯内化。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 157 lines · 128 tokens per session scan A 38124d2d3a4f
leadership-triple is a skill published in the GitHub repository ace3000chao/book2startup (80 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 128 tokens to every session and 2,466 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
situational-leadership
Matches leadership style to follower development level using Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership model. Maps four styles -- directing, coaching, supporting, delegating -- to four development levels based on competence and commitment per task. Use when diagnosing style mismatches causing disengagement…
apply-managerial-leverage
Use when deciding how to allocate a manager's or leader's limited time across competing activities — before defaulting to whatever is most urgent, estimate each candidate activity's leverage (how many people's output it affects, for how long, and whether it requires your specific position), because a manager's actual…
delegation-and-empowerment
Develops the daily practice of effective delegation, accountability diagnosis, and team empowerment. Covers assessing which tasks require personal attention, clarifying scope and context for delegated work, allowing productive struggle, recognising and correcting micromanagement, and leading through influence rather…
hackman-enabling-conditions
Diagnoses and designs team effectiveness using Hackman's six enabling conditions: a real team, compelling direction, right people, sound structure, supportive context, and expert coaching. Shifts focus from blaming team members to establishing the structural and environmental conditions that make high performance…
leadership-style-adaptation
Provides practical self-diagnosis exercises and daily habits for recognising when a leader's default style fails and adapting in real time. Focuses on behavioural flexibility rather than theory -- how to read the room, when to shift approach, and how to stay authentic while flexing. Complements the theoretical models…
radical-candor
Applies Kim Scott's Radical Candor framework to improve feedback culture by balancing caring personally with challenging directly. Maps management behaviour across four quadrants: Radical Candor, Ruinous Empathy, Obnoxious Aggression, and Manipulative Insincerity. Use when preparing difficult performance…