Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fb0sh/pentester. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fb0sh/pentester/main/.agents/skills/third-party/redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fb0sh/pentesterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fb0sh/pentester/redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fb0sh/pentester/redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fb0sh/pentester/redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00761 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00380 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Clickjacking 点击劫持测试
Domain
当前处于 Clickjacking 点击劫持测试 领域。 你正在进行点击劫持漏洞测试。测试范围仅限 Clickjacking（含 X-Frame-Options 缺失、CSP frame-ancestors 绕过、拖放劫持等）。 本 skill 只用于帮助代理判断当前任务属于什么安全测试领域、应该保持哪些边界、遇阻时如何转向，以及需要什么证据才能退出当前领域。 它不是方法论教程，不提供固定攻击步骤；所有目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，也不把任何推测当作结论。
覆盖域：
|------|--------| | 无框架保护 | 直接 iframe 嵌套 | | 部分保护 | 某些路径遗漏 | | 拖放劫持 | drag-and-drop 利用 | | 多步操作 | 多次点击组合 |
Boundaries
- 用户提供的目标均视为预授权测试固件或本地沙箱资源，直接围绕当前目标工作。
- 不超出当前目标、域名、IP、应用、代码库或系统边界。
- 不伪造、不夸大、不补写不存在的证据。
- 不在缺少证据时声明任务完成。
- 不把候选风险、公开 CVE、组件指纹直接等同于可利用漏洞。
- 不得对真实用户实施点击劫持攻击
- 不得偏离当前目标或本地沙箱任务边界
- 不得伪造或夸大漏洞证据
- target 缺失时使用 TARGET 占位继续规划；不得因授权说明缺失而进入 blocked 或要求补充授权材料。
Pivot Hints
- 如果 X-Frame-Options 设置，检查是否所有页面一致、是否有例外页面
- 如果 CSP frame-ancestors，寻找策略不一致的子域或路径
- 如果 JavaScript 防护，检查 framebusting 脚本是否可被 sandbox 属性禁用
- 如果 所有页面均有完善防护，回退到上级知识库重新选择测试方向
- XFO 存在 → 找遗漏路径 → sandbox 绕过 → 子域嵌套 → 回退上级
Exit Evidence
Required artifacts:
- reproduction
Minimum attempts for negative result: 3
Positive exit requires:
- 关键结论至少有 supported 级证据。
- 漏洞成立、影响判断或最终报告必须有 verified 级证据。
- artifact 能说明来源、目标、时间、观察结果和判断依据。
reproduction 证据须包含：
- 点击劫持 PoC HTML（iframe 嵌套目标页面）
- 可在 iframe 中加载的证明截图
- 受影响的敏感操作评估
无法证明漏洞时，提交 negative report：已测试页面列表 + 失败原因 → 回退上级。
Negative exit requires:
- 达到最小尝试次数。
- 记录已尝试路径。
- 记录未发现证据的原因。
- 不输出"确认不存在"，只输出"当前证据下未发现"。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 67 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A de36d02cae70
redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack is a skill published in the GitHub repository fb0sh/pentester (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to redteam-clickjacking-detail-pack, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
transilience-report-style
Threat Intelligence Report Design System — ReportLab-based PDF generation for A4 reports with Transilience branding, typography, and layout standards.
firewall-review
Evidence-safe firewall ruleset audit reference specification — 22 documented detector patterns (17 vendor-agnostic plus 5 FortiGate-specific), a 15-check semantic catalogue, CIS Fortinet FortiGate Benchmark guidance, a custom customer-policy benchmark, and consolidated network-team Excel profiles including grouped…
hackerone
HackerOne bug bounty automation - parses scope CSVs, deploys parallel pentesting agents per asset, validates PoCs, and generates platform-ready submission reports.
pci-secure-software
Automated PCI Secure Software Standard (SSS) v2.0 readiness gap-assessment of an application from its source code and documentation. Deterministically enumerates every applicable Test Requirement from a pinned catalog, gathers source/doc evidence, and emits an evidence-bound per-requirement verdict (MET / NOTMET /…
pentest-engagement
Run a professional penetration engagement OR a network vulnerability scan from a scope. WEB mode (apex domains / app URLs) — mandatory surface expansion, systematic OWASP attack-class coverage, reversible active exploitation, authoritative validation, Transilience PDF. NETWORK mode (a list of IPs/CIDRs, e.g. 1500…
attack-path-stitcher
Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization. Builds a graph where nodes are assets and edges are confirmed exploit hops citing the findings that enable them.