Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/transilienceai/communitytools/coordinationnpx skills add transilienceai/communitytools --skill coordinationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/transilienceai/communitytoolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/transilienceai/communitytools/coordination)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/transilienceai/communitytools/coordination"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/transilienceai/communitytools/coordination.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01790 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00895 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
coordination scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coordination
Runs as a spawned subagent (one per target). Within its own context, the coordinator holds engagement state inline — it does not delegate its thinking to further sub-subagents. Thinks before every action.
The parent orchestrator (main session) must not execute this workflow inline. If you find yourself doing P1-P5 in the main session, you skipped the spawn step in skills/hackthebox/SKILL.md (or the relevant platform skill) and the bookkeeping discipline is silently disabled.
Principle (Rule 0)
Source code first. Read all accessible source — application code, config, scripts, share contents — before any executor batch. Every answer is in the data you already have. Guessing without reading is the most common failure mode.
Workflow
P0: Ingest scope
↓
P1: Recon + read source code → write attack-chain.md → run preflight-checklist
↓
┌→ P2: Think — read chain + experiments.md, write 3 hypotheses (≥1 [wildcard]), pick 1-2 to test
│ P2b: Research (conditional) — see reference/creative-research.md
│ P3: Execute — spawn 1-2 executors with CHAIN_CONTEXT [+ RESEARCH_BRIEF]
│ P4: Integrate — materialize each candidate; **validate it now** (interleaved, strict per-finding,
│ fresh blind agents) → CONFIRMED | REJECTED | CURE→re-validate | DROPPED; update chain, revise theory
│ Coverage flips only on VALID (coverage-by-VALID); REJECTED/DROPPED classes stay pending → keep searching
│ No progress 1 batch → consider P2b · goal_attempts ≥ 3 on any conceptual goal → P4b
└─ loop (max 30 experiments; mandatory skeptic at experiments 5, 15, 25)
P4b: Reset — re-read all recon + source + chain. Creative Research (mandatory). Fresh theory.
P5: Engagement-thoroughness validation + Report (validated/ = VALID/REPAIRED only; drop-entirely, no gaps section)
Steps
- Recon + Source Code — read all accessible code (see
formats/reconnaissance.md). Run pre-flight checklist (reference/preflight-checklist.md). - Think — write 3 hypotheses to
attack-chain.md, ≥1 tagged[wildcard]. Pick 1-2 to spawn. - Test — 1-2 executors per batch, integrate before next.
- Validate (interleaved) — validate each candidate the instant INTEGRATE materializes it, on fresh blind agents (strict per-finding cure/drop loop → CONFIRMED | REJECTED | CURE | DROPPED); at loop end run the engagement-thoroughness validator (see
reference/validator-role.md). - Report — the
VALID/REPAIREDfindings in{OUTPUT_DIR}/artifacts/validated/(all of them, by construction) → Transilience PDF viaformats/transilience-report-style/SKILL.md.
What ships with it
22 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- reference/ATTACK_INDEX.md 17 KB
- reference/bookkeeping.md 3.8 KB
- reference/context-injection.md 3.2 KB
- reference/coordinator.md 4.6 KB
- reference/coverage-matrix.json 22 KB
- reference/coverage-matrix.md 14 KB
- reference/creative-research.md 5.1 KB
- reference/credential-loading.md 2.1 KB
- reference/executor-role.md 3.9 KB
- reference/GIT_CONVENTIONS.md 481 B
- reference/orchestrator.md 4.0 KB
- reference/OUTPUT_STRUCTURE.md 1014 B
- reference/output-discipline.md 6.2 KB
- reference/PATT_STANDARD.md 1.9 KB
- reference/preflight-checklist.md 6.6 KB
- reference/principles.md 7.5 KB
- reference/role-matrix.md 4.8 KB
- reference/severity-calibration.md 5.4 KB
- reference/skeptic-role.md 2.5 KB
- reference/spawning-recipes.md 7.3 KB
- reference/VALIDATION.md 17 KB
- reference/validator-role.md 7.4 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 99 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A b895f3e1c82f
coordination is a skill published in the GitHub repository transilienceai/communitytools (507 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,790 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pentester-playwright
Phases 1b/3/4 authorized browser automation — SPA recon, multi-role auth, route/API catalog, PoC screenshots, Evidence landing (scoped proxy). Skill-gate read for web phases. Use when Phase 1b/3/4 web work, JS-rendered SPA, real browser needed, HAR/network capture, or Playwright PoC evidence.
osint-recon
Phase 1 conditional OSINT depth — four-dimension model (server→site→domain→people; people is conditional). Skill-gate companion to pentester-enum-services / pentester-recon. Use for passive OSINT depth, full recon dimensions, author tracking, not as Phase 0/Schema replacement.
pentester-exploit
Phase 4 exploitation — PoC construction, exploit-db/msf search, safe verification. Required Skill-gate read at Phase 4. Use when starting Phase 4, exploitation, exploit, PoC, exploit-db, msf, Metasploit, or payload delivery.
pentester-recon
Phase 1 intelligence recon methodology — passive+active recon, stack fingerprint, attack-surface map. Required Skill-gate read at Phase 1 (with pentester-enum-services). Use when starting Phase 1, intelligence gathering, recon, reconnaissance, OSINT prep, target profiling, or attack surface mapping.
pentester-toolkit
Provision the pinned pentest toolset via DotSlash for the current scanenv (host-kali or kali-target-${ID}). Adapter, not a tool wrapper.
pentester-waf-bypass
Phase 4 conditional — WAF/filter bypass for authorized CTF/range/pentest when payloads are blocked. Use at Phase 4 if blocked, or when user mentions WAF bypass, filter evasion, SQL/XSS/command-injection bypass, or security filter analysis.