Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add feiskyer/codex-settings --skill code-simplifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/feiskyer/codex-settingsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/feiskyer/codex-settings/code-simplifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/feiskyer/codex-settings/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/feiskyer/codex-settings/code-simplifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/feiskyer/codex-settings/code-simplifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/feiskyer/codex-settings/code-simplifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00386 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00154 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplifier scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Simplifier
Make code easier to understand and maintain without changing what it does. Prefer readable, explicit code over compact or clever rewrites.
Scope and conventions
Use the user's named files or diff. Otherwise, focus on code touched in the current task or clearly identified recent changes; ask for a target if none is evident. Inspect surrounding code as needed without turning a local cleanup into a repository-wide refactor. For review-only requests, propose changes without editing.
Follow applicable project guidance, such as AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md, and the conventions in nearby code. Derive import style, function syntax, type annotations, framework patterns, and error handling from that project rather than imposing a different style.
Refinement criteria
- Preserve observable behavior, including public interfaces, outputs, errors, side effects, and evaluation order. Treat bug fixes or behavior changes as separate work unless requested.
- Reduce unnecessary nesting, duplication, and indirection where doing so makes the logic easier to follow. Keep helpful abstractions and separate unrelated concerns.
- Improve names and remove comments that merely restate the code; retain comments that explain intent or non-obvious constraints.
- Prefer explicit branches over nested ternaries or dense one-liners when they obscure the logic. Fewer lines alone is not an improvement.
Completion
Finish the scoped cleanup and validate it using checks appropriate to the change and the repository's requirements. For non-obvious rewrites, check relevant edge cases against the original behavior. If behavioral equivalence remains unclear, retain the original form and explain the limitation.
Report significant refinements, checks run, and any remaining validation gaps. If no worthwhile simplification is found, say so without manufacturing edits.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 28 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 26b26a06c649
code-simplifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository feiskyer/codex-settings (247 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 386 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
Other skills, from other repositories
github-review-pr
Review GitHub pull requests with detailed, multi-perspective code analysis using parallel subagents. Use this skill whenever the user wants to review a PR, asks for code review on a pull request, mentions "review PR", "check this PR", "look at pull request", or references a PR number or GitHub PR URL. Do NOT use for…
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
pr-review
Review a GitHub pull request using multiple expert personas. Takes a PR URL as input, analyzes the changes, and generates comprehensive review feedback from different perspectives (Merge Specialist, Frontend, Backend, Security, DevOps, AI/Agent, SRE, Chief Architect).
skill-creator
Create, refine, and benchmark agent skills. Use when building a new skill, updating an existing one, running evals, checking trigger quality, or improving a skill description.
deep-research
Multi-agent research orchestration: split a research goal into parallel sub-goals, run each via headless claude -p subprocesses, aggregate results into a polished report file. Use for systematic web/document research, competitive or industry analysis, batch link/dataset processing, and long-form evidence synthesis.…