revise-paper

Revise Paper from Review Report

Systematically apply revisions from a review report to a manuscript. Follows Prose Track rules — never auto-edits without approval.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to a review report, or leave blank to auto-detect.

Step 1: Locate the Review Report

If $ARGUMENTS is provided, use that path. Otherwise glob for:

• quality_reports/paper_review_*.md
• quality_reports/*_substance_review.md
• quality_reports/*_proofread.md

If multiple reports found, use AskUserQuestion:

• header: "Review Report"
• question: "Multiple review reports found. Which should I use for revisions?"
• options: list found reports (label: filename, description: date and type). User can select one.

Step 2: Locate the Manuscript

Read the review report and extract the manuscript path from its File: field.

If the file doesn't exist at that path, glob for:

• manuscripts/**/*.tex
• manuscripts/**/*.qmd

If multiple manuscripts found, use AskUserQuestion to let the user pick.

Read the full manuscript.

Step 3: Parse the Review Report

Extract all actionable items and classify them:

Priority	Source Section	Action
Critical	Major Concerns with "CRITICAL" or "BLOCKING"	Must fix before any submission
Major	Major Concerns, Referee Objections	Should fix — a reviewer would flag these
Minor	Minor Concerns, Specific Comments	Polish — fix if time allows

For each item, extract:

• The issue description
• The suggested fix (if provided)
• The location in the manuscript (section, line, table)

Step 4: Present Revision Plan (WAIT FOR APPROVAL)

Present the revision plan grouped by priority:

## Revision Plan

### Critical (N items) — must fix
1. [MC1: Title] — Section X — [brief description of fix]
2. ...

### Major (N items) — should fix
1. [MC2: Title] — Section Y — [brief description of fix]
2. ...

### Minor (N items) — polish
1. [mc1: Title] — Section Z — [brief description of fix]
2. ...

Total: N revisions across M sections.