Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Felpix-Studios/social-science-research --skill write-papergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Felpix-Studios/social-science-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/felpix-studios/social-science-research/write-paper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felpix-studios/social-science-research/write-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felpix-studios/social-science-research/write-paper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/felpix-studios/social-science-research/write-paper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/felpix-studios/social-science-research/write-paper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01718 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00859 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
write-paper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Write Paper Draft
Draft an academic manuscript from existing analysis outputs. Follows propose-first — the outline is always shown for approval before writing begins.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — a paper title, research question, or from spec to read from quality_reports/specs/.
Step 1: Orient
Read project context:
CLAUDE.md— project name, author, institutionreferences/domain-profile.md— field (used to calibrate outline conventions in Step 3)- Most recent file in
quality_reports/specs/— research question and identification strategy - Most recent file in
quality_reports/lit_review_*.md— related literature (if it exists) - Most recent file in
quality_reports/research_ideation_*.md— hypotheses (if it exists)
If no spec exists, ask the user for the core research question before proceeding.
Step 2: Inventory Analysis Outputs
Glob for available outputs:
output/tables/**/*.tex— regression tablesoutput/tables/**/*.html— HTML table versionsoutput/figures/**/*.pdf,output/figures/**/*.png— figuresoutput/**/*.rds,output/**/*.pkl,output/**/*.parquet— saved objects
List what exists. Note any gaps (e.g., "no summary statistics table found").
Step 3: Propose Outline (WAIT FOR APPROVAL)
Draft a paper outline using this standard structure:
1. Abstract
2. Introduction
3. Background
4. Data & Methods
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Appendix
References
The structure is flexible. Default to the hardcoded outline above unless (a) the user requests a different structure, or (b) the field in references/domain-profile.md has strong conventions that warrant deviation (e.g., merging Background into Introduction, splitting Data & Methods into separate Data and Empirical Strategy sections, or reordering sections). If you deviate from the default, state explicitly why and confirm with the user before writing.
Adapt the writing style — not the structure, by default — to the field from references/domain-profile.md. A political science paper reads differently than an econometrics paper even with the same section headings: econ prose leads with identification and is terse about theory; poli sci prose leads with theoretical framing and treats measurement validity as a first-class concern; sociology leans on theoretical framework prose. Mirror the conventions of the field's top journals when drafting each section.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 128 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 4e4c2e272320
write-paper is a skill published in the GitHub repository Felpix-Studios/social-science-research (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,718 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…