Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/fergius-engineering/instincts/user-action-edge-casesnpx skills add Fergius-Engineering/instincts --skill user-action-edge-casesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Fergius-Engineering/instinctsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fergius-engineering/instincts/user-action-edge-cases)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fergius-engineering/instincts/user-action-edge-cases"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fergius-engineering/instincts/user-action-edge-cases.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
user-action-edge-cases scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
The rule
Anything you depend on that a user can touch will get renamed, moved, deleted, and duplicated. If your code assumes a fixed path or a single copy, it breaks the first time the user does something ordinary. Before you finish, run those four actions through your head.
Fires when
Your code reads, writes, or depends on a file, a record, a document, or any state the user can edit outside your code.
How to apply
For each thing you depend on, ask the four questions: renamed? moved? deleted? duplicated?
Prefer finding things by type or id over a hardcoded path or name. Decide what happens in each case instead of assuming it won't happen.
Worked example
Your app stores its settings in a file at a hardcoded path. It works on your machine. Then a user renames the file, and the app silently writes a fresh one with defaults, losing their config. Or they copy the project folder, and now two copies fight over the same path. Looking the file up by a stable marker instead of a fixed name, and handling "not found" and "more than one" on purpose, turns four silent bugs into defined behavior.
Red flags
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The file is always at this path" | Until the user moves it. |
| "There's only ever one" | Until they duplicate it. |
| "They won't rename it" | They will. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 31 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 4ffd490a9347
user-action-edge-cases is a skill published in the GitHub repository Fergius-Engineering/instincts (2 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 338 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
rulesync
Generates and syncs AI rule configuration files (.cursorrules, CLAUDE.md, copilot-instructions.md) across 20+ coding tools from a single source. Use when syncing AI rules, running rulesync commands, importing or generating rule files, or managing shared AI coding configurations.
establishing-project-context
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
autoprompt
Explicit-only useful-first orchestration. Invoke /autoprompt to turn a mission into one executable roadmap, build dependency-safe lanes, and verify the result with independent reviewers. Never infer invocation from ordinary requests. Never resume from leftover artifacts without an explicit resume instruction.
gitnexus
将 GitNexus 作为受控可选代码智能能力接入，用于 brownfield MCP 查询、影响面分析、 detectchanges、多仓分析和更深代码图谱证据。输出必须回落到 /team- 主链和 artifacts。.
loop
Full execution protocol for MODE: LOOP — the compound-engineering loop: brainstorm → plan → build → review → improve, iterating under defense-in-depth stop conditions with generator/critic separation, durable resumable state, and mandatory compounding learning capture. Loaded on demand by the architect when the loop…
restore-internals-seams-in-finally-blocks-after-each-test
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.