loop

loop is a skill for OpenCode from ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm. It costs 72 tokens per session (3,758 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A repeatable software-development workflow that moves through brainstorming, planning, implementation, review, and improvement in separate stages.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running multi-step coding tasks, coordinating delegated work, reviewing results, and recording lessons for later cycles.
Why use it?
It gives large tasks checkpoints and independent review so mistakes are caught before the work is considered finished.

Skill for OpenCode

Written for OpenCode: installed under .opencode/. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions AGENTS.md.

Good fit Running multi-step coding tasks, coordinating delegated work, reviewing results, and recording lessons for later cycles.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm --skill loop
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm

Made for: OpenCode.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for loop

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for loop

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/zaxbyhub/opencode-swarm/loop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,758 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Agent Snooping · line 122
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 134
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 137
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 140
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 149
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 194
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.03758
Opus 5.5 $0.00029 $0.01503
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00752
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00376

Measured 7d ago against content hash 87ecec2f26ea, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

loop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.opencode/skills/loop/SKILL.md · 324 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 324 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Compound-Engineering Loop Protocol

MODE: LOOP runs an objective end to end as a series of gated phases, then loops to compound improvements until the objective is met or a stop condition fires. Each cycle reuses the existing mode skills (brainstorm, plan, critic-gate, execute, phase-wrap) and ends with a learning-capture step so the next cycle is cheaper — that is what makes the loop compounding rather than merely repeating.

This is a real implementation workflow: it delegates to the coder, declares scope, and mutates source code through the normal EXECUTE path. It is distinct from full-auto (a critic gate via the critic_oversight agent that intercepts phase completions and high-risk actions for review — full-auto never plans, delegates, or executes; the architect retains ALL delegation duty) and turbo (parallel lanes within a single phase). LOOP is a user-initiated, gated, sequential, compounding workflow.

The two design rules that everything below serves:

  1. Separate the generator from the verifier. The context that writes a change must never be the only context that approves it. Implementation, independent review, and critic challenge live in separate delegated contexts. Review is report-only; a distinct fix step applies changes.
  2. Stop on positive evidence or a budget — never on vibes. Every phase has an entry gate and an exit gate backed by concrete evidence, and the loop has layered stop conditions so it can never run away.

Step 0 — Parse Header

Parse the [MODE: LOOP ...] header to extract:

  • objective: the goal text after the header (the WHAT to achieve). Empty only when resume=true.
  • max_cycles: integer 1..5 (default 3) — hard cap on outer improvement cycles.
  • autonomy: auto (default) or checkpoint.
    • auto: proceed across gates without prompting, but still enforce every hard stop condition and the mandatory review/critic gates.
    • checkpoint: pause at each phase gate and wait for explicit user approval before continuing.
  • depth: standard (default) or exhaustive (wider exploration in BRAINSTORM and PLAN: more candidate approaches, deeper localization).
  • resume: true | false. When true, resume the existing run from durable state instead of starting a new objective.

Read the full file on GitHub · 324 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago Changed · +1 lines 87ecec2f26ea
  2. 1mo ago Changed 0de4c65d03e4
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 323 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 98c44e8e2d99

Subscribe to this mod's changes

loop is a skill published in the GitHub repository ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm (509 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 3,758 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.