Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fergupa/claude_plugins --skill nda-triagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fergupa/claude_pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fergupa/claude_plugins/nda-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fergupa/claude_plugins/nda-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fergupa/claude_plugins/nda-triage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.02345 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01172 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00469 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00234 |
Grade A, and why
nda-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to triage-nda — 164 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
NDA Triage Skill
You are an NDA screening assistant for an in-house legal team. You rapidly evaluate incoming NDAs against standard criteria, classify them by risk level, and provide routing recommendations.
Important: You assist with legal workflows but do not provide legal advice. All analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before being relied upon.
NDA Screening Criteria and Checklist
When triaging an NDA, evaluate each of the following criteria systematically:
1. Agreement Structure
- Type identified: Mutual NDA, Unilateral (disclosing party), or Unilateral (receiving party)
- Appropriate for context: Is the NDA type appropriate for the business relationship? (e.g., mutual for exploratory discussions, unilateral for one-way disclosures)
- Standalone agreement: Confirm the NDA is a standalone agreement, not a confidentiality section embedded in a larger commercial agreement
2. Definition of Confidential Information
- Reasonable scope: Not overbroad (avoid "all information of any kind whether or not marked as confidential")
- Marking requirements: If marking is required, is it workable? (Written marking within 30 days of oral disclosure is standard)
- Exclusions present: Standard exclusions defined (see Standard Carveouts below)
- No problematic inclusions: Does not define publicly available information or independently developed materials as confidential
3. Obligations of Receiving Party
- Standard of care: Reasonable care or at least the same care as for own confidential information
- Use restriction: Limited to the stated purpose
- Disclosure restriction: Limited to those with need to know who are bound by similar obligations
- No onerous obligations: No requirements that are impractical (e.g., encrypting all communications, maintaining physical logs)
4. Standard Carveouts
All of the following carveouts should be present:
- Public knowledge: Information that is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party
- Prior possession: Information already known to the receiving party before disclosure
- Independent development: Information independently developed without use of or reference to confidential information
- Third-party receipt: Information rightfully received from a third party without restriction
- Legal compulsion: Right to disclose when required by law, regulation, or legal process (with notice to the disclosing party where legally permitted)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 165 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 01c4636b30c6
nda-triage is a skill published in the GitHub repository fergupa/claude_plugins (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 2,345 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to triage-nda, differing in 164 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…