Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add FerroxLabs/wayland --skill ai-evaluation-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/waylandWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/ai-evaluation-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/ai-evaluation-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/ai-evaluation-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/ai-evaluation-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/ai-evaluation-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 565 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.08226 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00034 | $0.03290 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01645 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00823 |
Grade A, and why
ai-evaluation-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 576 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 8082fe549611
ai-evaluation-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/wayland (613 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 8,226 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
PR babysit (watch & drive to green)
Watch a pull request and delegate fixes until CI is green and reviews are addressed. Requires the GitHub MCP server or gh.
Check work (verify against criteria)
Verify an implementation against acceptance criteria with a reviewer and a tester.
Write tests
Add focused, meaningful tests for code — happy path plus the edge cases that matter.
qa
QA testing skill with real browser automation. Use when asked to "test this site", "QA this page", "check for visual bugs", "verify the deploy", or when Hydra needs browser validation for UI changes. Requires the browse binary.
playwright
Use when the task requires automating a real browser from the terminal (navigation, form filling, snapshots, screenshots, data extraction, UI-flow debugging) via playwright-cli or the bundled wrapper script.
develop-web-game
Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with rendergametotext.