Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to FerroxLabs/wayland. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FerroxLabs/wayland/main/.claude/skills/oss-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FerroxLabs/waylandWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/oss-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/oss-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ferroxlabs/wayland/oss-pr.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 26 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01146 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00573 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00229 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00115 |
Grade A, and why
oss-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 148 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A b4493dabee5c
oss-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository FerroxLabs/wayland (601 stars, last pushed today), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,146 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
PR babysit (watch & drive to green)
Watch a pull request and delegate fixes until CI is green and reviews are addressed. Requires the GitHub MCP server or gh.
Commit (clean, conventional)
Stage the right changes and write a clear, conventional commit message.
git-release-manager
Use when the user explicitly asks to prepare, tag, publish, push, or audit a Git release. Inspect branch, worktree, version metadata, changelog, tests, and release artifacts first, obtain confirmation for irreversible release actions, and record a recovery path.
pull-request-author
Use when the user asks to prepare, update, audit, or submit a pull request. Inspect repository contribution rules, branch state, diff, tests, and the target base first; create a focused reviewable change description and do not commit, push, or open a hosted pull request without explicit authorization.
git-commit-instructions
Use when preparing git commits or PR-ready commit text; generates repository-compliant Conventional Commit messages with correct type/scope syntax, concise subject lines, and clear rationale/body formatting.
codew-release-qa-sweep
Use before claiming Codewhale release work is done: run the full gate sweep and list the manual QA targets.