Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fiberplane/claude-code-plugins --skill fp-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fiberplane/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fiberplane/claude-code-plugins/fp-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fiberplane/claude-code-plugins/fp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fiberplane/claude-code-plugins/fp-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fiberplane/claude-code-plugins/fp-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fiberplane/claude-code-plugins/fp-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.02139 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00856 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00428 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00214 |
Grade C, and why
fp-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
> curl -fsSL https://setup.fp.dev/install.sh | sh -s Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
> curl -fsSL https://setup.fp.dev/install.sh | sh -s How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 365 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
FP Review Skill
Ensure commits are properly linked to issues and provide review feedback.
Prerequisites
Before using fp commands, check setup:
# Check if fp is installed
fp --version
If fp is not installed, tell the user:
The
fpCLI is not installed. Install it with:curl -fsSL https://setup.fp.dev/install.sh | sh -s
# Check if project is initialized
fp tree
If project is not initialized, ask the user if they want to initialize:
This project hasn't been initialized with fp. Would you like to initialize it?
If yes:
fp init
Core Purpose
- Verify commits are assigned to the correct issues
- Leave review comments on issues
- Open interactive review in the desktop app
- Create stories — narrative documents that walk through code changes
Assigning Commits to Issues
Check Current Assignments
fp issue files <PREFIX>-X
If empty, the issue has no commits assigned.
Find Relevant Commits
jj log --limit 20 # Jujutsu
git log --oneline -20 # Git
View Commit Details
jj show <commit-id> # Jujutsu
git show <hash> --stat # Git
Match Commits to Issues
Compare:
- Files changed in commit vs issue description
- Commit message content vs issue title
- Code changes vs issue requirements
Assign Commits
Before assigning commits, confirm with the user. Some users prefer to work without committing until they're done, or may not want commits linked to issues.
Use AskUserTool to ask:
I found these commits that appear related to
<PREFIX>-X:
abc123- Add user modeldef456- Implement auth middlewareWould you like me to assign them to the issue? (If you prefer to review uncommitted changes instead, you can run
fp reviewfor the working copy.)
If confirmed:
# Single commit
fp issue assign <PREFIX>-X --rev abc123
# Multiple commits
fp issue assign <PREFIX>-X --rev abc123,def456,ghi789
# Current HEAD
fp issue assign <PREFIX>-X
# Reset and reassign
fp issue assign <PREFIX>-X --reset
fp issue assign <PREFIX>-X --rev abc123,def456
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 365 lines · 52 tokens per session scan C b4c199b40fbc
fp-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fiberplane/claude-code-plugins (40 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 2,139 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
tech-debt
Track, categorize and prioritize technical debt across the codebase — scans for debt indicators, maintains a register.
pr-review-triage
Watch open PRs, check CI status, review staleness, merge conflicts, and unanswered review comments. Produces a prioritized watchlist.
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
systemic-issue-triage
Trigger: new issue, bug report, triage, backlog, issue flood, community report, root cause, dead-end, blocked user. Attack issues by root class, never one-by-one; fixes must shrink the system, not grow it.
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only…
feature-dev
Guide a feature implementation through a structured seven-phase workflow with deep codebase understanding, clarifying questions, parallel architecture design, and quality review. Use this skill when the user asks to build a new feature, add functionality, or wants a methodical approach to implementation rather than…