Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add firatcand/forge --skill fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/firatcand/forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firatcand/forge/fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firatcand/forge/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firatcand/forge/fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firatcand/forge/fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firatcand/forge/fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00478 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00191 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/fix
Preflight: worktree guard
Task-scoped mutating skill — must run from a worktree, not the main checkout. Contract: skills/_shared/worktree-guard.md.
TOPLEVEL="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo '')"
if [ -z "$TOPLEVEL" ]; then
echo "✗ worktree-guard: not inside a git repository" >&2
exit 1
fi
BRANCH="$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo '')"
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^origin/@@' || echo 'main')"
if [ -f "$TOPLEVEL/.forge/worktree-task.json" ]; then
echo "✓ worktree-guard: $TOPLEVEL ($BRANCH)"
elif [ "$BRANCH" = "${DEFAULT_BRANCH:-main}" ]; then
echo "✗ worktree-guard: refusing to run on default branch '$BRANCH' from $TOPLEVEL" >&2
echo " Parallel Claude Code sessions on the main checkout clobber each other's HEAD." >&2
echo " → cd into an existing worktree, or run /pickup-task to create one." >&2
exit 1
else
echo "⚠ worktree-guard: no .forge/worktree-task.json at $TOPLEVEL (branch: $BRANCH)" >&2
echo " Proceeding, but this worktree may be manually-created or stale." >&2
fi
Preconditions
plans/tasks/{LINEAR-ID}.investigation.md must exist and be < 24 hours old.
Process
- Read investigation
- Apply minimal fix matching root cause
- Add regression test that reproduces the original bug (Test-or-die)
- Verify fix + test passes
- Commit with conventional message:
fix(scope): brief description
After 3 failed attempts
Stop. Demand fresh /investigate. Do not thrash.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 49 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A e91facf336d1
fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository firatcand/forge (13 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 478 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
fix
Polymorphic iterative repair loop — accept a verifier failure, structured findings (review/resolve/triage-issue), or a bug description; modify→verify→keep on green, auto-revert on guard regression, until clean or iteration cap. Use when the user says "fix", "make it pass", or "apply the findings", or hands an artifact…
srgn-cli
Build safe, syntax-aware srgn CLI commands for source-code search and transformation. Use for srgn commands, scoped refactors (comments/docstrings/imports/functions), multi-file rewrites with --glob, tree-sitter queries, or CI checks with --fail-any/--fail-none.
ast-grep
Code search, analysis, and refactoring using ast-grep (sg). Use for AST-based code modifications, structural search, and linting.
qa
Conversational QA mode — user reports bugs in plain language, agent clarifies minimally, files GitHub issues that survive refactors. Trigger on "QA", "QA session", or ad-hoc bug reporting without a fixed deliverable shape. Distinct from branch-scoped and PR-scoped review.
debug
Hypothesis-driven defect isolation — stack-trace forensics, breakpoint strategy, state inspection, and root-cause confirmation via minimal repro. Use when a defect surfaces (test failure, crash, exception, wrong output, intermittent flake) and the cause is not immediately obvious from the change set.
perf-profile
Hotspot detection and performance root-cause analysis: flamegraph interpretation, allocation tracking, latency profiling, regression measurement. Use when a workload misses its latency, throughput, or memory budget; when a benchmark regresses; or before optimizing any hot path (no optimization without a profile).