plan-task

A planning command that creates a structured plan for the current task. It must run in a separate Git worktree, an isolated working copy, and is required before implementation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before implementing a task to read the relevant issue or project plan and prepare the required work sequence.
Why use it?
It helps turn a task into explicit steps while checking that work is happening in the correct branch and directory.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/firatcand/forge/plan-task
Any agent
npx skills add firatcand/forge --skill plan-task
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/firatcand/forge

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,273 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00020 $0.01273
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00636
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00255
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00127

Measured 2d ago against content hash 80f44f1b2543, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/plan-task/SKILL.md · 88 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/plan-task

Preflight: worktree guard

Task-scoped mutating skill — must run from a worktree, not the main checkout. Contract: skills/_shared/worktree-guard.md.

TOPLEVEL="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo '')"
if [ -z "$TOPLEVEL" ]; then
  echo "✗ worktree-guard: not inside a git repository" >&2
  exit 1
fi
BRANCH="$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo '')"
DEFAULT_BRANCH="$(git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's@^origin/@@' || echo 'main')"
if [ -f "$TOPLEVEL/.forge/worktree-task.json" ]; then
  echo "✓ worktree-guard: $TOPLEVEL ($BRANCH)"
elif [ "$BRANCH" = "${DEFAULT_BRANCH:-main}" ]; then
  echo "✗ worktree-guard: refusing to run on default branch '$BRANCH' from $TOPLEVEL" >&2
  echo "  Parallel Claude Code sessions on the main checkout clobber each other's HEAD." >&2
  echo "  → cd into an existing worktree, or run /pickup-task to create one." >&2
  exit 1
else
  echo "⚠ worktree-guard: no .forge/worktree-task.json at $TOPLEVEL (branch: $BRANCH)" >&2
  echo "  Proceeding, but this worktree may be manually-created or stale." >&2
fi

Steps

  1. Read Linear issue (or phases.yaml task) for current branch
  2. Determine task type → delegate to relevant specialist subagent (frontend-dev, backend-dev, db-architect, etc.)
  3. Specialist enters Plan mode: research codebase, propose approach
  4. Detect architectural forks. Before drafting the plan, enumerate every decision the implementation will require. For each one, classify it (see Fork severity filter below). Anything that passes the filter is a question — not a silent decision.
  5. Ask per fork, not in bulk. For each qualifying fork, emit an AskUserQuestion call following skills/_shared/question-format.md — re-ground, simplify, recommend, options with concrete trade-offs. Batch up to 4 questions per AskUserQuestion call; iterate as new forks surface during deeper research. Do not bundle 11 forks into a "Questions decided" table for the user to rubber-stamp.
  6. Write structured plan to plans/tasks/{LINEAR-ID}.plan.md:
    • Files to change (predicted)
    • Component tree / data flow
    • State / data flow
    • Edge cases
    • Test strategy
    • Questions asked & answers applied (not "decisions decided" — list each question, who answered, and the resulting branch in the plan)
  7. Show plan to user, wait for approval
  8. On approval: commit plan, unlock /implement
  9. Emit the second-opinion suggestion hint (one printed line; user types or skips):
    forge second-opinion suggest plan-task
    
    Prints 💡 Suggested next: /second-opinion review-plan (run with FORGE_AUTO_SECOND_OPINION=0 to disable). Silent when FORGE_AUTO_SECOND_OPINION=0 is set or second_opinion.auto_enabled: false in .forge/settings.yaml.

Read the full file on GitHub · 88 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 88 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 80f44f1b2543

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan-task is a skill published in the GitHub repository firatcand/forge (13 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.