work

work is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from first-fluke/fullstack-starter. It costs 22 tokens per session (57 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for coordinating several coding agents on a large project. It combines project planning, parallel work, and quality checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to plan multi-area projects, assign work to multiple agents, and run a final quality review.
Why use it?
It helps divide complex work into manageable parts while keeping the agents' results coordinated and reviewed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/work
Any agent
npx skills add first-fluke/fullstack-starter --skill work
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/first-fluke/fullstack-starter

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for work

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/work.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/work)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/work"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/first-fluke/fullstack-starter/work.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 57 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00057
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00028
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00011
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00006

Measured yesterday against content hash 7375baf2e777, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

work scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/work/SKILL.md · 11 lines

What it actually says

/work

Read and follow .agents/workflows/work.md step by step.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 11 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 7375baf2e777

Subscribe to this mod's changes

work is a skill published in the GitHub repository first-fluke/fullstack-starter (222 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 57 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.