Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge --skill writer-stylegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/writer-style)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/writer-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/writer-style/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/writer-style"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge/writer-style.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00376 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
writer-style scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 28d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Style and voice
When to use
Use for changing tone, comparing voices, building a reusable style profile, or revising prose that lost the author's voice.
Inputs and assumptions
Identify the desired reader effect, format, narrator, audience, language, and any author-provided or authorized samples. Style references are not sources of plot facts.
Portable workflow
- Read style choices and the project's existing profile.
- Translate labels into choices about viewpoint, distance, rhythm, vocabulary, imagery, dialogue, and emotional expression.
- For a blend, specify where each effect leads. Epic stakes need not imply ornate narration.
- Produce a short original calibration sample. If needed, compare two versions that differ in technique, not just adjective density.
- Extract a concise profile from the author's chosen version. Preserve scene-specific exceptions.
- For revisions, keep facts and intent fixed while changing expression. Identify changes that would require author approval.
Safety and side effects
Do not copy distinctive passages from reference works or infer authorization to reuse supplied material beyond the task. Ask before replacing an established voice profile. Do not apply blanket cleanup rules that erase deliberate style.
Scripts, references, and dependencies
No scripts. The project workflow defines approval and saving conventions.
Verification
Check the result against the actual requested reader effect and samples. Confirm that canon did not change as a side effect of stylistic revision.
Pi adapter
Use /writer style --style "emotional, restrained" --brief "Compare two voices for the reunion scene".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 28d ago First seen · 41 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 25b4f6c8d916
writer-style is a skill published in the GitHub repository Firstp1ck/pi-coding-agent-forge (91 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 376 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
Other skills, from other repositories
convex-component-authoring
How to create, structure, and publish self-contained Convex components with proper isolation, exports, and dependency management.
npm-docs
Use this skill whenever the user asks about npm, package management, publishing packages, semantic versioning, npm CLI commands, or Node.js dependencies. Covers npm 12.x including the registry, scopes, organizations, security (audit, provenance, 2FA), CI/CD integration, workspaces, scripts, .npmrc configuration, and…
convex-component-authoring
How to create, structure, and publish self-contained Convex components with proper isolation, exports, and dependency management.
dependency-manager
Manage project dependencies — update packages, audit vulnerabilities, resolve conflicts, and keep dependencies healthy. Use when updating packages, fixing vulnerability alerts, or resolving dependency issues.
colab-finetuning
Fine-tune LLMs on Google Colab GPUs directly from openscience. Connects to Colab runtimes via WebSocket bridge for remote training with Unsloth. Supports SFT, GRPO, DPO, vision, and TTS workflows on free T4 to Pro A100 GPUs.
swarm-pr-review
Run a graph-guided, tool-augmented PR review using context packing, parallel exploration, mandatory repository-agnostic risk-family coverage with dispatch scaled to diff size and risk, independent reviewer validation, critic challenge, and metrics writeback. Use for deep pull request review with low false-positive…