Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill bmad-retrospectivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-retrospective)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-retrospective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/bmad-retrospective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.14499 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.05800 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.02900 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01450 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-retrospective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-retrospective — 42 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,513 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Retrospective Workflow
Goal: Post-epic review to extract lessons and assess success.
Your Role: Developer facilitating retrospective.
- No time estimates — NEVER mention hours, days, weeks, months, or ANY time-based predictions. AI has fundamentally changed development speed.
- Communicate all responses in {communication_language} and language MUST be tailored to {user_skill_level}
- Generate all documents in {document_output_language}
- Document output: Retrospective analysis. Concise insights, lessons learned, action items. User skill level ({user_skill_level}) affects conversation style ONLY, not retrospective content.
- Facilitation notes:
- Psychological safety is paramount - NO BLAME
- Focus on systems, processes, and learning
- Everyone contributes with specific examples preferred
- Action items must be achievable with clear ownership
- Two-part format: (1) Epic Review + (2) Next Epic Preparation
- Party mode protocol:
- ALL agent dialogue MUST use format: "Name (Role): dialogue"
- Example: Amelia (Developer): "Let's begin..."
- Example: {user_name} (Project Lead): [User responds]
- Create natural back-and-forth with user actively participating
- Show disagreements, diverse perspectives, authentic team dynamics
Conventions
- Bare paths resolve from the skill root.
{skill-root}resolves to this skill's installed directory (wherecustomize.tomllives).{project-root}-prefixed paths resolve from the project working directory.{skill-name}resolves to the skill directory's basename.
On Activation
Step 1: Resolve the Workflow Block
Run: python3 {project-root}/_bmad/scripts/resolve_customization.py --skill {skill-root} --key workflow
If the script fails, resolve the workflow block yourself by reading these three files in base → team → user order and applying the same structural merge rules as the resolver:
{skill-root}/customize.toml— defaults{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.toml— team overrides{project-root}/_bmad/custom/{skill-name}.user.toml— personal overrides
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,513 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 997308d99954
bmad-retrospective is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 14,499 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-retrospective, differing in 42 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
msg
Root menu for msg skills, plus harness modes. Bare /msg says the next step for each PRD in progress and offers to run it — use it when the user says "what's next", "where am I", "what should I run now". --init is the project setup — use it when the user says "initialise project", "bootstrap repo", "set up the…
intake
The planning front-door. Captures feature ideas and bugs as graded rows in the root INTAKE.md ledger. Use it when the user says "log an idea", "capture a bug", "add to the backlog", "note this down", "track this feature", or invokes /intake. Opens with one prompt ("What are you trying to build?"), infers the rest from…
plan-em
Engineering Manager skill. Reads an approved PRD, runs pre-flight checks against AHA.md, GLOSSARY.md and ARCHITECTURE.md, auto-runs plan-review certification inline (no ask), picks the specialist agents (it asks to approve the roster only when the roster is unusual for the project), spins them up to write engineering…
Scaleway Naming And Tagging
Scaleway naming convention and mandatory tags — resource-type abbreviations, region codes, and owner/cost-center/environment/workload tags for cost attribution.
plan-review
Staff PM contract certifier. Reads an existing PRD and runs a fixed seven-check certification, each check tied to a named downstream consumer. Picks the product check or the eng check from the PRD's content, auto-fixes every Critical and Major, logs Minors without asking, and stops only for a product decision. Writes…
Incident Management
Severity classification, runbook structure, and blameless postmortems — so incidents are handled calmly, restored fast, and learned from.