Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flanliulf/SpecLite --skill speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flanliulf/SpecLiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flanliulf/speclite/speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.04193 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.01677 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00839 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00419 |
Grade A, and why
speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 327 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Speclite Goal Orchestrator Epic Story Review Runner（目标编排：Epic Story 审查执行器）
Overview（概述）
本 Skill 是 Epic 粒度 Story Review（SR）闭环的全局编排层。它只负责目标拆解、严格串行执行、进度记录、循环 gate 判断和最终本地提交，不替代 speclite-story-review-* 或 git-commit-convention 的内部能力。
核心原则：每一步必须等前一步完成后才能开始，绝不并行。若用户给出多个 Epic 或 Epic 范围，外层也必须按 Epic 严格串行推进。
When To Use（使用场景）
使用本 Skill，当用户提出类似以下请求：
Epic 10，请对该 epic，依次使用全新的 sub agent 执行...- 要求执行
speclite-story-review-01-reviewer epic {epic_id} - 要求执行
speclite-story-review-02-evaluator epic {epic_id} - 要求执行
speclite-story-review-03-fixer epic {epic_id} - 要求重复 reviewer/evaluator/fixer，直到 review 和 evaluation 都通过
- 要求维护
PLAN.md、EXPERIMENTS.md、EXPERIMENT_NOTES.md - 要求最后使用
git-commit-convention本地中文提交、不推送 - 明确要求 fresh sub-agent、strict serial、no parallel
不要使用本 Skill：
- 只审查单个 Story，且不需要完整 SR 循环
- 只需要运行
speclite-story-review-01-reviewer - 只需要提交代码
- 用户只是在询问状态，未要求执行
- 用户明确要求并行执行
Inputs（输入）
从用户请求中提取：
epic_scope：单个 Epic，例如10；或用户明确给出的 Epic 范围/子集model：默认GPT-5.5；若当前运行环境不支持，记录实际使用模型runtime_config：必须通过speclite resolve config --project-root {project-root}获取planning_artifacts：从 runtime config 读取，默认语义为{project-root}/_speclite-output/planning-artifactsimplementation_artifacts：从 runtime config 读取，默认语义为{project-root}/_speclite-output/implementation-artifactssr_dir：{implementation_artifacts}/story-reviews/epic-{epic_id}-story-review/progress_record_dir：{sr_dir}/goal-execute-records/plan_files：PLAN.mdEXPERIMENTS.mdEXPERIMENT_NOTES.md
commit_policy：默认中文 Conventional Commit，本地提交，不推送
如果无法识别 epic_scope、无法解析 runtime config，或无法定位 Epic/Story 输入，立即询问用户，不要猜测。
Speclite Adaptation（Speclite 适配）
本 runner 必须使用 SpecLite 运行时与现有 canonical skill：
- SR reviewer：
speclite-story-review-01-reviewer - SR evaluator：
speclite-story-review-02-evaluator - SR fixer：
speclite-story-review-03-fixer - 最终提交：
git-commit-convention
所有 Story、SR 和进度产物路径必须从 merged runtime config 推导，不得把历史默认输出根写成 runtime 依赖。常用路径约定：
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago First seen · 327 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 1ae8ef3f08fe
speclite-goal-orchestrator-epic-story-review-runner is a skill published in the GitHub repository flanliulf/SpecLite (4 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 4,193 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-comments
Execute a feature-level review-comments cycle — aggregate unaddressed PR comments across every Feature.Repos PR, address or dismiss each one, and emit the standard handoff.
review-implementation-functionality-evidence
Implementation review Functionality/Evidence axis - audits plan satisfaction and verification evidence.
review-implementation-craft
Implementation review Craft axis - audits intrinsic code quality only.
review-implementation-cleanliness
Implementation review Cleanliness axis - audits change-set hygiene and pushability.
final-fix
Final-review fix pass that addresses requested changes and refreshes invalidated evidence.
Security Audit Checklist
A PASS/FAIL/N/A checklist covering injection, authorization, secrets handling, dependency risk, and input validation for reviewing a diff or codebase.