Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flonat/flonat-research --skill bib-coveragegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-researchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/bib-coverage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/bib-coverage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/bib-coverage.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01341 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00671 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
bib-coverage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bibliography Coverage
LIBRARY-FIRST RULE: ALWAYS check Paperpile (paperpile search-library) when assessing coverage.
Compare a project's .bib file against a Paperpile project/topic folder to identify gaps between the project bibliography and the reference library.
When to Use
- After a literature search, to see what % of the topic collection is cited
- Before submitting a paper, to catch references you forgot to cite
- When reviewing a Paperpile project/topic folder, to find items not yet in any project's
.bib - After a bibliography-quality check, as a complementary completeness check
When NOT to Use
- Finding new references — use an installed literature-discovery workflow or scholarly search
- Validating .bib quality (missing fields, DOI issues, preprint staleness) — use an installed bibliography validator
- Building a .bib from scratch — use
bib-parseor an installed literature workflow
Inputs
- Project
.bibfile — detected automatically (same logic asbib-validate: look forreferences.bib, then any.bibin the project) - Paperpile folder — resolved from:
- Explicit
--topic <slug>argument - Project's
CLAUDE.mdor Atlas topic frontmatter - Directory name if inside a research project
- If no collection can be resolved, report an error and suggest specifying
--topic
- Explicit
Workflow
1. Load Project Bibliography
Parse the .bib file to extract all entry keys and titles.
2. Load Paperpile Folder
- Call
paperpile get-foldersto find the relevant full topic path - Call
paperpile get-items-by-folder "<full path>"to get items in that folder - Extract item keys (citekey) and titles
Paperpile's labelsNamed and foldersNamed are distinct. Project/topic
collections use folders. If a leaf occurs under multiple parents, stop and
request or derive the full path; never silently choose one.
Graceful degradation: If the paperpile CLI is unavailable, skip with a warning — report .bib-only stats.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 126 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 404b7290833f
bib-coverage is a skill published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (132 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
latex-compile
Compile a LaTeX document and fix every error plus aesthetic issue (overfull/underfull boxes, widows, alignment, fonts) for a clean PDF and log. Use this instead of running pdflatex/latexmk manually — it avoids the latexmk stale-log trap and silent grep failures on binary log output, and it reformats rather than…
beamer-presentation
Create academic presentations in Beamer with professional themes.
latex-tables
Generate publication-ready regression tables in LaTeX.
nature-data
Prepare, audit, or revise Nature-ready Data Availability statements, data repository plans, dataset citations, and FAIR metadata checklists for manuscripts. Use when the user asks about Nature data availability, research data sharing, repository selection, accession numbers, restricted or sensitive data, source data…
paper-compile
A build workflow that turns LaTeX source files into a PDF and checks whether the paper compiles correctly. LaTeX is a text-based system commonly used for academic papers.
publication-chart-skill
This skill should be used when the user asks for a publication-quality scientific figure or table, wants help choosing the right chart for results, needs a paper-ready pubfig or pubtab workflow, wants a figure + companion table for a results section, wants an Excel sheet turned into publication-ready LaTeX, or wants…