strategic-revision

strategic-revision is a skill for Claude Code from flonat/flonat-research. It costs 66 tokens per session (5,051 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for turning referee letters or internal paper feedback into a validated revision plan. It breaks changes into small tasks, maps their dependencies, and identifies the order and critical path.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps plan research-paper revisions from journal feedback, conference reviews, or internal pre-submission comments.
Why use it?
Feedback alone does not show which changes must happen first or how tasks depend on one another. This converts it into an executable sequence.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: $skill-name invocation.

Good fit It helps plan research-paper revisions from journal feedback, conference reviews, or internal pre-submission comments.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add flonat/flonat-research --skill strategic-revision
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flonat/flonat-research

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for strategic-revision

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for strategic-revision

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flonat/flonat-research/strategic-revision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 66 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,051 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high Memory Poisoning · line 92
    Skill manipulates agent memory, state, or stored context. Memory corruption can alter personality, override safety rules, or cause unpredictable behavior.
    Fix: Protect agent memory and state from modification by untrusted content. Use read-only memory for critical instructions and validate all state changes.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00066 $0.05051
Opus 5 $0.00033 $0.02525
Sonnet 5 $0.00013 $0.01010
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00505

Measured 8d ago against content hash 0a551374c8ba, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

strategic-revision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/dag_validator.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/strategic-revision/SKILL.md · 288 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Strategic Revision — Feedback to DAG-Validated Master Plan

Convert feedback on the author's own paper into a computationally validated revision plan. The shared analytical core produces atomic tasks, a dependency DAG, execution blocks A--E, a critical path, and bottleneck analysis. Provenance determines which of two modes supplies and stores the surrounding artifacts:

  1. External R&R mode preserves genuine venue correspondence and prepares response-oriented tracking.
  2. Internal revision mode consumes AI reviews, review syntheses, or informal collaborator feedback without representing them as venue correspondence.

Provenance: DAG validation + critical-path architecture adapted from Jukka Sihvonen's strategic-revision skill (https://github.com/jusi-aalto/strategic-revision). the user's ingestion layer (correspondence scaffolding, LaTeX verbatim, R&R routing, venue strategy, coaching) retained.

When to Use

  • Received reviewer or editor reports from a journal or conference
  • Need to turn internal pre-submission reviews into an executable revision sequence
  • Have a review-cluster or synthesise-reviews output that needs dependency mapping and critical-path validation
  • Need to extend an existing revision DAG with another review of the same draft

When NOT to Use

  • Writing the actual response letter (use generated response blocks as a starting point, then write manually)
  • Reviewing someone else's paper (use proofread or peer-reviewer agent)
  • Combining overlapping internal reports without execution planning — use synthesise-reviews first
  • Applying fixes directly without first producing and approving a plan

Modes and Provenance Gate

Select the mode from who authored the source feedback, not from whether it sounds like a referee report. Full routing and cross-mode rules: references/modes.md.

Mode Source provenance Source location Plan location External-only artifacts
external Human reviewer/editor acting for a venue correspondence/referee-reviews/ and/or correspondence/editorial/ correspondence/referee-reviews/{venue}-round{n}/ Preserved source, verbatim transcription, rebuttal scaffold, venue strategy, reviews-in history event
internal AI review/skill/agent, manual external-AI output, or informal supervisor/co-author feedback AI: reviews/<scope>/<source>/; human collaborator: correspondence/internal/ reviews/<scope>/strategic-revision/{YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM}/ None

Read the full file on GitHub · 288 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 288 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 0a551374c8ba

Subscribe to this mod's changes

strategic-revision is a skill published in the GitHub repository flonat/flonat-research (133 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 5,051 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

fin-paper-convert

Compile LaTeX to PDF and convert to target journal format.

csmar432/finai-research · 12 tokens

fin-paper-plan

Generate structured paper outline adapted to target journal.

csmar432/finai-research · 8 tokens

doc-audit

Evaluate one project document in detail — a workbook section, big picture, strategy map, handoff message, paper, brief, or primer — without editing it. Runs the mechanical lint, builds a claim ledger, types every headline against the eight claim statuses in CLAUDE.md, traces cited evidence to the scripts and logs that…

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 140 tokens

latex-compile

Compile a LaTeX document and fix every error plus aesthetic issue (overfull/underfull boxes, widows, alignment, fonts) for a clean PDF and log. Use this instead of running pdflatex/latexmk manually — it avoids the latexmk stale-log trap and silent grep failures on binary log output, and it reformats rather than…

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 79 tokens

claim-audit

Audit what a passing script actually established, before writing any prose about it — build the computed-object ledger, rewrite every check's label as the weakest statement that makes its body pass, and separate the verdict on someone else's work from your own new claim. Run after the script passes and BEFORE the…

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 75 tokens

nb-to-wolfbook

Convert Mathematica .nb or .m files to Wolfbook .wb format so they open and run in VS Code. Use when bringing existing .nb/.m files into Wolfbook, or to make an existing .wb bridge-safe.

Mexregkan/claude-for-researchers · 53 tokens