Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add flurdy/agent-skills --skill complete-taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/flurdy/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/flurdy/agent-skills/complete-task)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flurdy/agent-skills/complete-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flurdy/agent-skills/complete-task/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/flurdy/agent-skills/complete-task"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/flurdy/agent-skills/complete-task.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 6 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.04405 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.01762 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00881 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00441 |
Grade A, and why
complete-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 371 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Complete Task
Run clean-code, stage, and commit an in-progress task — the finalization phase of development.
Normally a fully verified bead closes on trunk / direct-commit, stays open for /create-pr in
PR mode, and stays open on detached HEAD until the commit is safely owned. Applicable project
policy wins. Future-event-only evidence uses the explicit deferred-verification choice in §6, not an
unqualified completion claim.
When to Use
- Code changes are verified and ready to commit
- After
/verify-taskhas passed (or verification is not needed), or returned the qualified deferred-verification tracking handoff - Replacing manual Phase 3 (Commit and Close) steps
Prerequisites
Run /verify-task before this skill to confirm requirements are met and test coverage is adequate.
If you haven't verified yet, do that first. Its deferred-verification tracking handoff is the
only incomplete-evidence exception: the verdict remains Incomplete evidence, and only the named
future-event check is outstanding. All other requirements and presently executable checks must pass
with unchanged scope. Any failed, stale, not-run check, missing local coverage or ordinary unavailable
evidence blocks this path; never relabel a failure as waiting for a rollout.
Consume the report's requirement rows, revision and pending-event packet; do not infer eligibility from a clean tree or commit. This exception permits committing authorized implementation and the confirmed tracking disposition in §6, not claiming full verification.
Usage
/complete-task # Auto-detect in-progress bead
/complete-task <bead-id> # Complete a specific bead
Instructions
1. Identify the Task
Determine which bead is being completed, then prove which store owns it before reading or closing anything. Never infer the owning store from the bead ID or the current directory: at a workspace root the cwd store is the workspace store, not the repository that owns the work.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +15 lines 0a6574fa25b6
- 4d ago Changed 5e400ed7adfa
- 6d ago Changed · +121 lines db1bd9bcfd90
- 7d ago Changed · +18 lines cdf74e0616ea
- 1mo ago Changed · +49 lines · -5 tokens per session 6e5f17f25485
- 1mo ago First seen · 168 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 10af9f2f6513
complete-task is a skill published in the GitHub repository flurdy/agent-skills (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 4,405 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.