full-review

full-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from fmind/dot. It costs 37 tokens per session (803 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A read-only health check for the fmind/dot repository, a configuration repository containing command-line tools and computer setup files. It checks the build, command-line behavior, tool versions, and documentation consistency.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run the repository’s checks, smoke-test the dot command, inspect tool currency, and compare AGENTS.md and README.md with the current code.
Why use it?
It helps distinguish actual repository problems from local issues such as missing authentication or optional secrets without changing the repository or installed setup.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/fmind/dot/full-review
Any agent
npx skills add fmind/dot --skill full-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmind/dot

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for full-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dot/full-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/full-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dot/full-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dot/full-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 803 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00037 $0.00803
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.00402
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00161
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00080

Measured yesterday against content hash bbd7ea1d9913, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

full-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/full-review/SKILL.md · 53 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 53 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Full Review

Confirm the dot repository is healthy end to end: the gate is green, dot works, pinned tools are current, and AGENTS.md, README.md, and the skills describe the live repository. Every step is read-only or idempotent (no chezmoi apply, mise upgrade, mise run release, or mise run prune); project-health is the fixing pass for any repository.

Workflow

  1. Validate the gate: mise run check, mise run test, and mise run build.

  2. Confirm the dot CLI:

    dot verify        # environment, tools, secrets, install freshness
    dot --help        # every command carries an alias, matching skills/dot-cli/SKILL.md
    dot status        # git, docker, k3d smoke test
    mise run doctor   # chezmoi doctor + mise doctor
    mise run diff     # pending chezmoi diff, read-only
    

    A dot verify failure is a repository bug only when local state (an unauthenticated CLI, a missing optional secret) does not explain it.

  3. Check tool and dependency currency, report only:

    mise outdated              # repository-scoped tools
    mise -C "$HOME" outdated   # global tool list
    mise --version             # warns when mise itself is behind
    go -C dot list -m -u all   # Go module updates
    

    mise outdated sees only mise pins; also scan action versions in .github/workflows/*.yml, plugin versions in dprint.json, and exact-version pins in dot_config/mise/config.toml.tmpl. Hand anything stale to upgrade-tools.

  4. Check README drift: README.md is outside the docs contract; cross-check its skill count, prerequisites, install steps, and environment variables, and hand drift to readme-agents.

  5. Report: every failure, staleness, or drift grouped by the step that surfaced it; fix small root-cause findings directly and route upgrades or doc rewrites to the skills above.

Gotchas

Read the full file on GitHub · 53 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 53 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A bbd7ea1d9913

Subscribe to this mod's changes

full-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmind/dot (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 803 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.