Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fmind/dotfiles --skill readme-agentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fmind/dotfilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/readme-agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/readme-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dotfiles/readme-agents/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fmind/dotfiles/readme-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fmind/dotfiles/readme-agents.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00164 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
readme-agents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Sync README and AGENTS Files
Refresh AGENTS.md and README.md to accurately reflect the repository's state.
Scope
AGENTS.md(For AI): Tooling, commands, technical conventions, and repository layout.README.md(For Humans): Project purpose, installation, setup, and usage.
Workflow
- Research: Scan the root directory and key config files (e.g.,
pyproject.toml,go.mod,mise.toml,lefthook.yml) to identify tools and structure. - Update AGENTS.md:
- Refresh tool list and commands.
- Update the Layout section (a bullet list of top-level files/dirs with a one-sentence purpose each).
- Update README.md:
- Ensure purpose, prerequisites, and usage examples are current.
- Remove stale instructions.
- Validate: run
lychee README.md AGENTS.mdso refreshed links are proven live, not assumed.
Gotchas
- Separation of Concerns: Do not mix user-facing installation instructions (for
README.md) with technical conventions and rules (forAGENTS.md). - No-Hard-Wrap: Keep each paragraph on a single line in both files.
Documentation
- AGENTS.md Open Standard — the README-for-humans vs AGENTS.md-for-agents split.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 605fe9191a7f
readme-agents is a skill published in the GitHub repository fmind/dotfiles (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
full-review
Full review: read every repo area, apply verified fixes, and prove all checks pass.
duckdb
Query and export CSV, Parquet, JSON, or SQLite data with DuckDB.
observability
Instrument Python services and agents: structlog logs, OpenTelemetry traces and metrics.
resolve-conflicts
Resolve Git merge or rebase conflicts by both sides' intent; verify the result.
skill-security-review
Review third-party skills and agent extensions for supply-chain risk.
sops-secrets
Encrypt, rotate, and inject Git secrets with sops and age.