Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2 --skill review-and-summarizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/review-and-summarize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/review-and-summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/review-and-summarize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/review-and-summarize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2/review-and-summarize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.00174 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00087 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
review-and-summarize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
対象: $ARGUMENTS（未指定の場合は git diff --staged）
タスク
-
上記対象に code-review と同じ観点でレビューする
-
Critical/High 0 件であれば次に進む。あれば停止して指摘だけ返す
-
PR description ドラフトを以下の形式で生成:
変更概要
変更理由
動作確認
レビュー観点 (Critical/High 0 件の確認結果)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 21 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 1cc3175812df
review-and-summarize is a skill published in the GitHub repository forest6511/claude-code-recipes-v2 (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 174 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
End-to-end playbook for shipping high-quality pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — discovery, CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size check, minimal-diff implementation, PR description with AI-assisted disclosure, conflict resolution, and post-submission maintainer interaction. Use whenever creating…
pr-pending-feedback
Evaluate pending (unsubmitted) review comments on the current branch's PR and, after user confirmation, address each in a separate sub-agent and separate commit.