Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/forge-mlopsnpx skills add ForgeyClap/claude-forge --skill forge-mlopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ForgeyClap/claude-forgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/forge-mlops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/forge-mlops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/forgeyclap/claude-forge/forge-mlops.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01490 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00745 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
forge-mlops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 39 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Forge playbook — Production ML / MLOps
Do not duplicate ECC skills — defer to: systematic-debugging (pipeline/training failures), /test-coverage (data-validation + feature-code tests), forge-data (the upstream ETL/feature pipeline), forge-prediction (uncertainty labeling + no-auto-bet rules when the model informs a betting/forecast decision). This file is orchestration only.
The unit of value in MLOps is a reproducible, versioned, monitored model that a human decides to promote — not a one-off notebook accuracy number. The dangerous failure is a model that looks better offline, silently skews at serving, decays over weeks, or worse, is wired to act (spend, send, trade) on its own. A model informs; the owner promotes and the owner gates any irreversible action.
Hard rules
- Reproducible training. Seeds fixed, dependencies pinned, data + code + config versioned (DVC / MLflow / a manifest), and the run captured so the same code + same data regenerates the same metric. An accuracy you can't reproduce is not a result.
- Model versioning + working rollback. Every model artifact is immutable and versioned in a registry with its training data/version and metrics attached. There is a tested rollback path and a fallback model (or graceful degradation) if the new one fails at serve time.
- No train/serve skew. Feature engineering is versioned and identical between training and serving. A data-validation gate at pipeline entry (schema + range checks) rejects bad input before it poisons training or inference.
- Offline + online evaluation before promotion. Offline: a proper holdout / time-based backtest with the task-appropriate metric (AUC/PR, MAE/RMSE, calibration) compared against the incumbent, not in a vacuum. Online: shadow / canary / A-B — never a hard cutover of a new model onto a critical path.
- Drift + decay monitoring. Feature drift, prediction drift, and performance decay are monitored with alerts; retraining triggers are defined (not "we'll notice eventually"). Serving endpoints have health checks, timeouts, and bounded retries.
- No automatic real-money / irreversible / outward-facing action — ever. The model produces a prediction/score; it does not auto-spend, auto-trade, auto-send, or auto-execute. Promotion to production is an explicit owner-gated step (Forge honesty + irreversible-action rule). No secrets or credentials embedded in pipeline code or model artifacts.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 39 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 3cd9fa8466e0
forge-mlops is a skill published in the GitHub repository ForgeyClap/claude-forge (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,490 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
frame-macos-notification
拟真 macOS 通知 banner + app icon + 标题正文, 适合 video overlay / 产品发布预告.
deck-course-module
暖纸背景 + Playfair, 左侧学习目标常驻, 含 MCQ 自测页.
deck-pitch
10 页融资 deck, 白底 + 蓝紫渐变 hero, traction 柱状, $X.XM ask.
argent-tv-interact
Control and inspect TV apps via argent — Apple TV (tvOS), Android TV (leanback), and Amazon Fire TV (Vega). Boot the target, read focus, navigate with the D-pad remote, type, screenshot, and on Vega debug the JS runtime (evaluate, console logs, network inspector). Use when a task targets a TV (runtimeKind "tv", or…
review-offered-task
Review a task that has been offered to you and decide whether to accept or reject it.
aidd-dev:08:for-sure
Iterative agent loop that tracks attempts and retries until a success condition is met. Use when the user says "for sure", "make sure", "keep trying until", "loop until done", "don't stop until", or needs guaranteed completion of a task with explicit success criteria.