Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fortunto2/solo-factory --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fortunto2/solo-factoryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fortunto2/solo-factory/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fortunto2/solo-factory/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fortunto2/solo-factory/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fortunto2/solo-factory/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fortunto2/solo-factory/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.03509 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.01754 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00702 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00351 |
Grade A, and why
solo-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 341 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/plan
This skill is self-contained — follow the steps below instead of delegating to external planning skills (superpowers, etc.).
Research the codebase and create a spec + phased implementation plan. Zero interactive questions — explores the code instead.
When to use
Creates a track for any feature, bug fix, or refactor with a concrete, file-level implementation plan. Works with or without /setup.
MCP Tools (use if available)
session_search(query)— find similar past work in Claude Code chat historyproject_code_search(query, project)— find reusable code across projectscodegraph_query(query)— check dependencies of affected filescodegraph_explain(project)— architecture overview: stack, languages, directory layers, key patterns, top dependencies, hub fileskb_search(query)— search knowledge base for relevant methodology
If MCP tools are not available, fall back to Glob + Grep + Read.
Steps
-
Parse task description from
$ARGUMENTS.- If empty, ask via AskUserQuestion: "What feature, bug, or refactor do you want to plan?"
- This is the ONE question maximum.
-
Detect context — determine where plan files should be stored:
Project context (normal project with code):
- Detected by:
package.json,pyproject.toml,Cargo.toml,*.xcodeproj, orbuild.gradle.ktsexists in working directory - Plan path:
docs/plan/{trackId}/
Knowledge base context (documentation-centric project):
- Detected by: NO package manifest found, BUT directories like
docs/,notes/, or structured numbered directories exist - Plan path:
docs/plan/{shortname}/ - Note: the shortname is derived from the task (kebab-case, no date suffix for the directory)
Set
$PLAN_ROOTbased on detected context. All subsequent file paths use$PLAN_ROOT. - Detected by:
-
Load project context (parallel reads):
CLAUDE.md— architecture, constraints, Do/Don'tdocs/prd.md— what the product does (if exists)docs/workflow.md— TDD policy, commit strategy (if exists)package.jsonorpyproject.toml— stack, versions, deps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 341 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 8032b6647c28
solo-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository fortunto2/solo-factory (18 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 3,509 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
harness
Route Harness Starter Kit workflows. Use when the user invokes /harness with adopt, doctor, update, refresh, review, or review sub-agent, or asks to apply, diagnose, maintain, or review repository harness guidance.
product-diagnosis
Six-question diagnostic framework for G0 pre-check — validate product direction before development starts.
review
L1 internal review with auto-detection, design comparison, and Gate escalation path.
harness-adopt
Apply Harness Starter Kit prompt-first adoption to a target repository. Use when the user asks to apply, install, adopt, or bootstrap repository harness guidance, checks, memory, and adoption reporting.
dev-plan
Generate a development plan with task breakdown and section 10 tracking tables.
knowledge-feedback
Scan child projects for pitfalls and propose company standard updates.