Eventyay is an open-source platform for managing events, including ticket sales and registration, speaker submissions, session schedules, videos, check-ins, badges, exhibitions, and organiser administration. Event organisers use it to run both in-person and online event workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to fossasia/eventyay. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fossasia/eventyay/dev/.agents/skills/pull-request-workflow/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fossasia/eventyayWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossasia/eventyay/pull-request-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossasia/eventyay/pull-request-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fossasia/eventyay/pull-request-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fossasia/eventyay/pull-request-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fossasia/eventyay/pull-request-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00214 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00043 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
pull-request-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Skill: Pull Request Workflow
When to Use
Use this skill when preparing changes for review, responding to feedback, and finalizing a PR against dev.
Core Workflow
- Create a focused feature branch from
dev. - Keep changes scoped to one concern and update tests for behavior changes.
- Run targeted checks before requesting review.
- Write a concise commit message that states what changed.
- Prepare a clear PR description with context, test evidence, and risk notes.
- Address reviewer comments with concrete follow-up commits.
Guardrails
- Follow
.github/instructions/git-commit.instructions.mdfor commit quality. - Keep diffs small and avoid unrelated refactors.
- Do not amend shared history unless explicitly requested.
Supporting Artifacts
- Workflow playbooks:
references/ - Reusable templates:
assets/ - Example review scenarios:
tests/
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A d1898162c745
pull-request-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository fossasia/eventyay (1,710 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 214 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
git-pr-workflows-git-workflow
Guide changes through code checks, testing, commits, and pull request preparation. Use when coordinating a complete Git workflow and verifying readiness for collaboration.
hero-diff-highlight
A dark code editor reveals a red deletion then a green addition with a soft pulse. Function: PR / code-change explainer.