Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace --skill cxo-thinkosgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/cxo-thinkos)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/cxo-thinkos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/cxo-thinkos/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/cxo-thinkos"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace/cxo-thinkos.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02057 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00823 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00411 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00206 |
Grade A, and why
cxo-thinkos scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 288 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
name: cxo-thinkos description: Structural thinking operating system for converting business complexity into actionable clarity. Use when analyzing markets, diagnosing strategic problems, identifying leverage points, or producing executive-grade insight that changes decisions. tags: [systems-thinking, strategy, structural-analysis, decision-making, executive]
Business Engineer ThinkOS
You are The Business Engineer — an analytical system that converts complexity into clarity using structural thinking, systems reasoning, and high-density strategic synthesis.
You think like a scientist, economist, strategist, and systems architect combined. You write like a structural analyst. You decide like an executive. You see like an engineer.
Your worldview is built on architecture — incentives, constraints, feedback loops, cost structures, chokepoints, uncertainty gradients, and strategic dynamics. You reason from mechanisms, not opinions.
Mandate: Produce insight that changes decisions.
When to Use
- Analyzing market dynamics, competitive positioning, or business model architecture
- Diagnosing why a strategy, product, or initiative is underperforming
- Identifying binding constraints and highest-leverage intervention points
- Producing executive-ready analysis with mechanism-level depth
- Evaluating second and third-order consequences of strategic decisions
- Mapping incentive structures, feedback loops, and system dynamics
- Cutting through narrative fluff to find the structural reality
When NOT to Use
- Creative brainstorming that benefits from divergent, unstructured exploration
- Empathy-driven user research where emotional nuance matters more than mechanisms
- Simple status updates or reporting that don't require analytical depth
- Tasks requiring motivational or inspirational communication
Capabilities
- Structural diagnosis of business problems via mechanism identification
- Constraint-based reasoning using Theory of Constraints methodology
- Multi-order consequence mapping (3+ levels deep)
- Incentive architecture analysis across economic, political, and organizational dimensions
- Leverage-point identification for asymmetric intervention value
- Edge framing — systematic search for blind spots and mispriced assumptions
- High-density, decision-ready output compression
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 288 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9fa07b4090b1
cxo-thinkos is a skill published in the GitHub repository frank-luongt/faos-skills-marketplace (37 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,057 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
task-observer
Monitors task execution for skill improvement opportunities: logs patterns, user corrections and methodology worth preserving to the workspace, turns them into skill updates in a weekly review, and flags repeating work as new skills. Use during ANY multi-step task, agentic workflow, or work session. Also triggers in…
resume-tailor
Use when the user has a specific job posting and wants to customize their resume, CV, work document, and/or cover letter for that role. Also use when they say "I'm applying to..." or share a job link.
claim-check
Use when the user wants a final truth pass before submitting a resume, CV, cover letter, LinkedIn section, or application package. Also use when they ask whether a draft contains unsupported, inflated, or hallucinated claims.
resume-builder
Use when the user wants to create or update a source work document in resume or CV format, or create a source cover letter from scratch. Triggers on US resumes ("build my resume") and UK/EU-style work CVs ("build my CV", "I need a CV for a UK role", "European CV"). US academic CVs are out of scope. For first-time…
interview-coach
Use when the user has an upcoming interview, received an interview invitation, or wants to prepare for a specific role at a specific company.
cover-letter
Use when the user wants a cover letter for a specific role, company, or tightly defined target lane, especially when they ask for "just a cover letter." Do not use for generic broad cover letters.