Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro --skill review-templategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro/review-template)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro/review-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro/review-template/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro/review-template"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro/review-template.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00574 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
review-template scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review SOP
Review 動作清單
Phase 1: 範圍確認
git log --oneline $TASK_START..HEAD
比對預期 commit 數量，非預期 commit 立即回報。
Phase 2: 變更審計
git diff --stat $TASK_START..HEAD
確認只有預期類型的檔案被修改（.md / .ts / .py）。
Phase 3: 行為驗證
- 非文件類變更逐一確認是否改變行為
- 刪除的 code 用 grep 確認 0 imports
Phase 4: Gate
跑完整測試套件，比對基線數字。
Phase 5: 產出報告
使用下方輸出結構。
輸出結構
# Code Review 報告
## 摘要
[一句話總結這次變更]
## 🚫 Blockers（必須修才能 merge）
| # | 檔案:行 | 問題 | 建議修法 |
|---|---------|------|----------|
| 1 | ... | ... | ... |
## ⚠️ Non-blocking（建議修，但不阻擋 merge）
| # | 檔案:行 | 問題 | 建議修法 |
|---|---------|------|----------|
| 1 | ... | ... | ... |
## 風險評估
- **整體風險：** [低/中/高]
- **影響範圍：** [列出受影響的系統/功能]
- **需要額外測試：** [是/否，說明]
## 測試缺口
- [ ] [缺少的測試案例]
## 👍 優點
- [值得稱讚的地方]
審查清單
- 正確性（邏輯錯誤、邊界案例、null/undefined）
- 跨邊界契約（request/response schema）
- 型別安全（runtime vs types 不符）
- 錯誤處理（失敗模式、retry/backoff）
- 併發（race conditions、resource cleanup）
- 安全（注入、XSS、SSRF、authz）
- 效能（N+1 查詢、unbounded loops）
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 70 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d1614ec4c220
review-template is a skill published in the GitHub repository frankekn/three-kingdoms-kiro (11 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 574 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…