Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add franklee16/academic-research-skills --skill lit-review-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/franklee16/academic-research-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/franklee16/academic-research-skills/lit-review-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/franklee16/academic-research-skills/lit-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/franklee16/academic-research-skills/lit-review-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/franklee16/academic-research-skills/lit-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/franklee16/academic-research-skills/lit-review-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01626 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00813 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00325 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
lit-review-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 231 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A a1e7fd861a0e
lit-review-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository franklee16/academic-research-skills (215 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,626 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
academic-search
Search and analyze academic literature. Find papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize academic findings for research projects.
Web Research Report
Synthesize fetched web sources into a structured research report on a topic: key findings, themes, tradeoffs, and a recommendation, with citations. Use for web research, literature review, and report writing.
research-ops
Use when someone hands you an open question whose answer must survive scrutiny — a tech choice, a regulation, a what-is-actually-true-about-X — with every non-obvious claim dated and sourced, source disagreements surfaced rather than averaged away, and a cited memo as the deliverable. Also for refreshing a stale…
paper-workbench
Researcher-profile-driven paper intake and literature workbench for academic workflows. Use whenever the user wants to skim, deep-read, card, compare, synthesize, map research gaps, or build a literature review from papers, arXiv/AlphaXiv links, DOIs, PDFs, or existing workbench artifacts. Trigger even when the user…