Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill lit-review-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/lit-review-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/lit-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/lit-review-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/lit-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/brycewang-stanford/auto-empirical-research-skills/lit-review-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.01626 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00650 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00325 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00163 |
Grade A, and why
lit-review-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 231 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A a1e7fd861a0e
lit-review-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills (4,786 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,626 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
lit-review-assistant
Search, summarize, and synthesize economics literature.
formulate-hypotheses
Generate testable hypotheses from theory, empirical regularity, anomaly, or explicit explanatory competition. Deductive, inductive, abductive, and competing-hypothesis generation are modes; discriminating predictions and comparison are activated in competing mode.
bias-detection
Assess systematic biases in the evidence body — publication bias, reporting bias, and selective outcome reporting. Budget: 40 studies, 40 effect sizes, 40 web searches.
falsification-first-audit
Convert a sharp scientific claim into the cheapest decisive falsification program. Steelman the claim into a precise testable form, specify observations/computations that could break it, execute the most informative probes first, and return only BROKEN, CORROBORATED, or UNFALSIFIABLE rather than a resilience score.
map-validity-envelope
Map where a claim, method, or design remains valid by defining variation axes, probing systematic or adversarial/boundary values, detecting breakpoints, and constructing a multidimensional validity envelope. Critical-case selection is an optional inference-maximizing mode.