Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to frankxai/agentic-ops-hub. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/main/.claude/skills/coding-guardrails/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/frankxai/agentic-ops-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/coding-guardrails)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/coding-guardrails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/coding-guardrails/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/coding-guardrails"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/frankxai/agentic-ops-hub/coding-guardrails.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01325 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00530 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00265 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
coding-guardrails scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +8 lines 48a6e287e2fa
- 27d ago Changed · +7 lines a3641b437a86
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 04ba1480319c
coding-guardrails is a skill published in the GitHub repository frankxai/agentic-ops-hub (2 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,325 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
codegraph
Use the local CodeGraph CLI or an already configured MCP server to find symbols, callers, dependencies, and change impact in a repository. Use when the user names CodeGraph or repeated structural code exploration would benefit from a reusable index. Not for a simple text lookup, prose-only repositories, or automatic…
readonly-review
Run a no-network read-only review practice with two explorer steps and one synthesis step.
xp-code-review
Review pending changes for tests, maintainability, and project rules. Use when the user asks for code review, review pending changes, or alignment with maintainability and project rules.
fic-validate-plan
Validate that an implementation plan was executed correctly. Use when the user asks to verify completion, compare code changes to a plan, or produce a validation report.
repo-contracts-and-boundaries
Use when turning architecture, layering, ownership, dependency direction, schemas, structural metrics, quality thresholds, baselines, allowlists, or generated quality snapshots into repository checks.
improve-codebase-architecture
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.