Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add fusengine/agents --skill design-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fusengine/agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/agents/design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/agents/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/agents/design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fusengine/agents/design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fusengine/agents/design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.03025 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.01210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00605 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00302 |
Grade A, and why
design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 179 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Findings are tagged P0-P3 (Blocking / Major / Minor / Polish) and reported individually — there is NO aggregate score, health score, or letter grade, ever; an aggregated number invites self-grading theater.
The visual review is a bounded loop, maximum 2 fix cycles: the loop exits PASS only once the register-applicable positive floors are actually met, and a plateau (cycle 2 repeating cycle 1's finding) stops immediately even at cycle 1 of 2.
Before any "done" claim, a mandatory in-loop challenger gate judges the deliverable blind — fresh-context, off a rendered PNG only, never fed this procedure's own reasoning. A Block from the challenger must be resolved or owner-accepted before "done" is reported.
Design Review — Final Quality Gate
When
After design-motion (web/webapp) or directly after the mockup (design-ios/
design-android). The last step before reporting any design deliverable done — never
skipped, never reported as passed if it wasn't actually run
(references/review-procedure.md Failure Handling).
Input
- The complete rendered artifact: components/mockup with animations (if any) and interactive states.
design-system.mdas the audit baseline (tokens, forbidden fonts, contrast floors).- The
Je reproduisline written bydesign-web/design-webapp— three declared elements, two tagged[corpus: {reference}/{tokens section}](measured procedure, the craft) and one tagged[sector: {url} — register](register signal only;[sector: none — register from brief]is valid, an empty slot is not). A missing or untagged line is a blocking Part 1 finding — the binary verdict has no input without it. - The corpus pages opened (Gate 0 artefact 3): at least two
{reference}-recode/index.html, named. The[corpus: …]tags prove the corpus was read, never that it was seen — and a page sourced from markdown alone clears every mechanical check and reads dead. Absent ⇒ blocking Part 1 finding. - The on-screen inventory (Gate 0 artefact 4): what each section physically carries,
plus the screen-holding-floor verdict. Blocking when
VISUAL_DENSITY≤ 3 orDESIGN_VARIANCE≥ 6; reported otherwise. - Any declared premium pattern(s); the signature element (
design-methodStep 2) instead gets a Signature Dominance verdict. - The plan's two structural picks — hero treatment
(
design-method/references/macrostructure-bank.md) and body sequence (design-method/references/body-sequence-bank.md). A plan naming neither is itself a detector signal (anti-slop entry 15).brandregister; aproductdeliverable carries neither. - The register (
brand/product, fromdesign-methodGate 0) — an input, never inferred mid-review: check 14's floors, Part 2 item 8's floors and the Lookalike Test (item 8b) all branch on it.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/anti-ai-slop-audit.md 13 KB
- references/audit-checklist.md 4.1 KB
- references/consistency-checks.md 3.9 KB
- references/elicitation-visual.md 2.7 KB
- references/motion-audit.md 5.3 KB
- references/motion-verdict.md 3.2 KB
- references/pre-flight-checklist.md 37 KB
- references/review-procedure.md 19 KB
- references/ux-laws.md 3.9 KB
- references/ux-nielsen.md 6.4 KB
- references/ux-patterns.md 4.2 KB
- references/ux-wcag.md 3.0 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 179 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ff0282e66ec3
design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository fusengine/agents (34 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 3,025 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
visual
Define a brand's visual identity — logo usage rules and variations, a color palette with contrast ratios, typography and type scale, and photography, illustration and icon style. Use when the user needs to settle their brand colors, fonts, logo rules or imagery style, or formalize the visual assets they already have.
design-review
Create a Figma Slides deck summarizing a component's design journey — research, contract, options, prototype and test results — with title and summary slides. Use when the user needs to present a component's design work to stakeholders or walk a team through it. Not for feedback on a design; see /coaching:ux or…
form-cro
Optimize a web form for completion — cut fields, choose single or multi-step, fix labels, validation, button copy and trust signals. Use when people start a lead, contact, demo or checkout form but abandon it before submitting. Not for the whole signup-to-trial journey; see /marketing:signup-flow-cro.
a11y-audit
Audit a Figma component or frame for accessibility in one pass — design lint, contrast, color-blindness simulation, focus order — with fixes. Use when the user points at a Figma design and wants a quick accessibility check before it goes to development. Not for a full WCAG-EM audit of a built site or app, or mentoring…
export-tokens
Export the design tokens (variables) from a Figma file as CSS custom properties, Tailwind config or JSON, optionally saved to a file. Use when the user wants Figma colors, spacing and type values in code, or gives a Figma URL and asks for its tokens. Not for an inventory of the whole design system; see…
system-overview
Summarize a Figma file's design system — components, styles, token collections and modes, and page structure — in one structured overview. Use when the user is new to a Figma design system or wants to know what it contains before working with it. Not for exporting tokens as code; see /design:export-tokens.