Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add G1Joshi/Agent-Skills --skill deepseekgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/G1Joshi/Agent-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/g1joshi/agent-skills/deepseek)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/g1joshi/agent-skills/deepseek"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/g1joshi/agent-skills/deepseek/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/g1joshi/agent-skills/deepseek"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/g1joshi/agent-skills/deepseek.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01274 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00510 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00255 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
deepseek scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek provides state-of-the-art open foundation models, including DeepSeek-V3 (Mixture-of-Experts) and DeepSeek-R1 for chain-of-thought mathematical reasoning and agentic workflows.
When to Use
- High-Performance Open-Weights Reasoning & Coding: DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-V3 for mathematical reasoning, agentic logic, and code generation.
- Self-Hosted & Private LLM Deployments: Running enterprise reasoning models locally using vLLM, SGLang, or Ollama.
- Cost-Efficient API Scaling: Accessing state-of-the-art reasoning at a fraction of proprietary API costs.
- Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Verification: Parsing detailed
<think>reasoning traces for auditability and verification.
Quick Start
from openai import OpenAI
# DeepSeek exposes an OpenAI-compatible API endpoint
client = OpenAI(
api_key="your-deepseek-api-key",
base_url="https://api.deepseek.com"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-reasoner", # DeepSeek-R1
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "Solve: How many r's are in strawberry? Think step by step."}
]
)
# Reasoning output is provided in reasoning_content
print("Thinking Process:\n", response.choices[0].message.reasoning_content)
print("Final Answer:\n", response.choices[0].message.content)
Core Concepts
Consuming DeepSeek API with OpenAI SDK Compatibility
Querying DeepSeek models with reasoning token handling:
import os
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key=os.environ.get("DEEPSEEK_API_KEY"),
base_url="https://api.deepseek.com"
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="deepseek-reasoner", # DeepSeek-R1 reasoning model
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a quantitative systems engineer."},
{"role": "user", "content": "Design an optimal concurrent lock-free queue algorithm in C++."}
],
max_tokens=4096,
temperature=0.6,
)
# DeepSeek-R1 returns reasoning content separately
reasoning = getattr(response.choices[0].message, 'reasoning_content', None)
final_answer = response.choices[0].message.content
if reasoning:
print(f"=== Thinking Process ({len(reasoning)} chars) ===")
print(reasoning[:500] + "...")
print("\n=== Final Response ===")
print(final_answer)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +5 lines 571aa448c42b
- 27d ago Changed · +110 lines · +32 tokens per session 405ca28c9a9e
- 1mo ago First seen · 40 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A eb36cfff3ccf
deepseek is a skill published in the GitHub repository G1Joshi/Agent-Skills (15 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,274 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
hallucination-prevention
Detects and mitigates LLM hallucinations in production pipelines. Validates AI-generated facts, code, and decisions before they reach end users or downstream systems.
rag-and-memory
Patterns for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agent memory systems. Retrieves only relevant context, prevents context bloat, and maintains coherent state across sessions.
ai-ops
Guides operational excellence for AI/ML systems in production. Use when deploying models, managing inference infrastructure, monitoring model drift, or maintaining AI-powered features. Use when you need reliable, observable, and governable machine learning systems.
data-engineering
Guides data pipeline design, ETL/ELT workflows, schema evolution, and data quality assurance. Use when building data pipelines, designing data warehouses, migrating schemas, or ensuring data integrity across systems. Use when you need reliable, testable, and observable data flows.
context-engineering
Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.
doubt-driven-development
Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high…