Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to GadatheGod/freecad-mcp-pro. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/GadatheGod/freecad-mcp-pro/main/.opencode/skills/f-code-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GadatheGod/freecad-mcp-proWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gadathegod/freecad-mcp-pro/f-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gadathegod/freecad-mcp-pro/f-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gadathegod/freecad-mcp-pro/f-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gadathegod/freecad-mcp-pro/f-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gadathegod/freecad-mcp-pro/f-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
f-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 78 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review — FreeCAD Edition
Review FreeCAD geometry creation, FEM setup, or assembly changes along two axes:
- Standards — Do objects use correct types/properties per FreeCAD documentation?
- Spec — Does the geometry match the design spec or ticket?
Context
- FreeCAD docs:
/home/praveen/Desktop/Freecadmcp/docs/freecad/ - Object reference:
/home/praveen/Desktop/Freecadmcp/.opencode/skills/freecad-objects/ - Spec/ticket: Provided by user or found in
.scratch/
Process
1. Identify what was changed
Get the list of FreeCAD objects created/modified:
get_objects(doc_name="ProjectName")
2. Standards Review (parallel sub-agent)
Check against FreeCAD documentation:
Object Type Standards:
- Part::Box uses Length/Width/Height (not XSize/YSize/ZSize)
- Part::Cylinder uses Radius/Height (not Diameter)
- Part::Cone uses Radius/Radius2/Height
- Part::Torus uses Radius/MainRadius/MinorRadius
- Draft::Circle uses Radius (not Diameter)
- ViewObject.ShapeColor is [R,G,B,Alpha] with 0-1 range
- Placement.Base uses {x,y,z} not {X,Y,Z}
FEM Standards:
- ConstraintFixed references valid faces
- ConstraintForce references valid faces with correct direction
- FemMeshGmsh references valid shape
- CharacteristicLengthMax/Min are reasonable for part size
Common Errors to Flag:
- Wrong property names (e.g., "Diameter" instead of "Radius")
- Invalid face references (Face1 vs Face.1)
- Missing required properties
- Incorrect data types (string vs number)
3. Spec Review (parallel sub-agent)
Check against the design spec:
- All dimensions match spec values
- All features are present (holes, fillets, chamfers)
- Material properties match spec
- FEM constraints match spec (location, magnitude)
- Assembly hierarchy matches spec
4. Aggregate
Present findings under ## Standards and ## Spec:
Standards findings:
- Object type errors
- Property name/value errors
- FEM constraint errors
Spec findings:
- Missing features
- Dimension mismatches
- Missing constraints
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 78 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 842fd7327328
f-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository GadatheGod/freecad-mcp-pro (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.