Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gaelic-ghost/socket --skill assess-and-explain-threatgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaelic-ghost/socketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/assess-and-explain-threat)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/assess-and-explain-threat"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/assess-and-explain-threat/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/assess-and-explain-threat"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/assess-and-explain-threat.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00416 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00166 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
assess-and-explain-threat scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Assess And Explain Threat
Overview
Turn mixed evidence into a proportionate conclusion and advice the affected person can follow. Do not collapse signatures, reputation, scanner output, or unusual behavior into a binary safe/malicious verdict.
Read references/confidence-and-advice.md for conclusion vocabulary and the explanation shape.
Workflow
-
Restate the decision.
- Identify what the user must decide now and what can wait for more evidence.
-
Grade evidence by directness.
- Separate direct observations, reproducible behaviors, vendor or threat-intelligence claims, weak indicators, absence of findings, and speculation.
- Record contradicting evidence and coverage gaps.
-
Assess behavior and impact.
- State what access, execution, persistence, collection, credential use, network behavior, or data exposure is observed or technically plausible.
- Distinguish capability from intent and artifact presence from successful compromise.
-
Choose a calibrated classification.
- Use one classification from the reference and state confidence separately.
- Name the strongest supporting evidence and what would change the conclusion.
-
Give proportionate advice.
- Put urgent harm-reduction actions first.
- Separate containment, evidence preservation, recovery, credential actions, notification, and long-term hardening.
- Avoid destructive cleanup when evidence is weak and reversible isolation is available.
-
Give a plain-language explanation.
- Answer whether the concern is dangerous, what it appears to do, what is known versus inferred, what to do now, and when to escalate.
- Define specialist terms at first use and avoid fear-amplifying language.
Output
Return the conclusion, confidence, decisive evidence, contradictions/gaps, immediate actions, follow-up analysis, and a short non-specialist explanation.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 607a16f26800
assess-and-explain-threat is a skill published in the GitHub repository gaelic-ghost/socket (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 416 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
craft
Use when a product idea is still vague and needs to become a clear definition of what to build — "let's craft an app like X", "help me define what I actually want", "clarify this idea before we plan it". Also use before planning or implementation when requirements, UX, domain behaviour, or technical preferences have…
pipeline
Use when the user asks to take a substantial feature from an initial idea through implementation in one mostly autonomous run.
turbo-pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature built end to end after answering one round of questions and then being left alone — "turbo", "ask me once, then just build it", "I'll answer up front, don't come back to me", "decide the rest yourself". Not for a run that wants a spec approval and no tests (superb:fast-pipeline), one…
pipeline-auto
Use when the user wants a substantial feature taken from idea through implementation in one run with as little interruption as possible ("just build it", "don't keep asking me"), or when controlling such a run and a worker question, quorum responses, the drift budget, a human decision, a review class or a completeness…
bug-fix
Use when a bug, regression, or unexpected behaviour is reported and the user wants it fixed end to end — "why is X broken", "this stopped working after Y", "fix this crash". Also use when a symptom is known but its cause is not. Not for building new behaviour, and not for a change whose cause is already proven.
fast-pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature built quickly with low token cost and few interruptions, approves a spec once, and says no automated tests should be written because they will test it manually — "fast pipeline", "go fast, no tests, I'll test it myself", "don't keep asking me". Not for a run that should write or keep…