Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gaelic-ghost/socket --skill fsharp-csharp-interopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gaelic-ghost/socketWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/fsharp-csharp-interop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/fsharp-csharp-interop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/fsharp-csharp-interop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/fsharp-csharp-interop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gaelic-ghost/socket/fsharp-csharp-interop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00916 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00366 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00183 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
fsharp-csharp-interop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
F# And C# Interop
Purpose
Keep mixed F# and C# solutions intentional.
The practical job is to decide which language owns which responsibility, make the project-reference direction explicit, and shape public APIs so each language can call the other without awkward translation code leaking everywhere.
When To Use
- Use this skill when a solution contains both
.fsprojand.csprojprojects. - Use this skill when adding an F# library to a C# app or service.
- Use this skill when adding a C# host or infrastructure project around F# domain code.
- Use this skill when public package APIs need to work well from both F# and C#.
Source Check
Use repo-local .NET files, checked-out dependency sources, Dash MCP or Dash HTTP for installed .NET docsets, and then official Microsoft documentation when Dash/local coverage is missing or stale:
Boundary Workflow
- Inspect project graph:
rg --files -g '*.fsproj' -g '*.csproj' -g '*.sln' -g '*.slnx' - Identify the language-owned responsibilities:
- F# domain library
- C# host app
- C# ASP.NET Core service
- F# CLI
- shared abstractions
- tests
- Choose dependency direction.
- Shape the API at the boundary.
- Add tests from the consuming side when the boundary is public or fragile.
- Run solution-level build and tests.
Good Mixed Shapes
Common durable shapes:
- F# domain library consumed by a C# app or ASP.NET Core host
- F# transformation package consumed by C# tools
- C# infrastructure adapter consumed by an F# application
- shared test projects that verify public package behavior from both languages
Avoid mixed language solutions when the only reason is indecision. Ask for a language choice instead.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 3b3afab29937
fsharp-csharp-interop is a skill published in the GitHub repository gaelic-ghost/socket (7 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 916 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
craft
Use when a product idea is still vague and needs to become a clear definition of what to build — "let's craft an app like X", "help me define what I actually want", "clarify this idea before we plan it". Also use before planning or implementation when requirements, UX, domain behaviour, or technical preferences have…
pipeline
Use when the user asks to take a substantial feature from an initial idea through implementation in one mostly autonomous run.
turbo-pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature built end to end after answering one round of questions and then being left alone — "turbo", "ask me once, then just build it", "I'll answer up front, don't come back to me", "decide the rest yourself". Not for a run that wants a spec approval and no tests (superb:fast-pipeline), one…
pipeline-auto
Use when the user wants a substantial feature taken from idea through implementation in one run with as little interruption as possible ("just build it", "don't keep asking me"), or when controlling such a run and a worker question, quorum responses, the drift budget, a human decision, a review class or a completeness…
bug-fix
Use when a bug, regression, or unexpected behaviour is reported and the user wants it fixed end to end — "why is X broken", "this stopped working after Y", "fix this crash". Also use when a symptom is known but its cause is not. Not for building new behaviour, and not for a change whose cause is already proven.
fast-pipeline
Use when the user wants a feature built quickly with low token cost and few interruptions, approves a spec once, and says no automated tests should be written because they will test it manually — "fast pipeline", "go fast, no tests, I'll test it myself", "don't keep asking me". Not for a run that should write or keep…