Claude Scholar is a semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development, supporting literature review, coding, experiments, reporting, writing, and project knowledge management. Computer science and AI researchers use it across the research workflow with several coding-agent platforms; the catalogue contains its skills, commands, agents, hooks, plugin, and instruction.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar --skill web-design-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholarWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/web-design-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/web-design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/web-design-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/web-design-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/galaxy-dawn/claude-scholar/web-design-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 341 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.02460 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01230 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00492 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00246 |
Grade A, and why
web-design-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
4 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- web-design-reviewer — 98% identical, 1 lines differ
- web-design-reviewer — 98% identical, 1 lines differ
- web-design-reviewer — 98% identical, 3 lines differ
- web-design-review — 97% identical, 7 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 370 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Web Design Reviewer
This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.
Scope of Application
- Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
- SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
- Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
- CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
- Any other web application
Prerequisites
Required
-
Target website must be running
- Local development server (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000) - Staging environment
- Production environment (for read-only reviews)
- Local development server (e.g.,
-
Browser automation must be available
- Screenshot capture
- Page navigation
- DOM information retrieval
-
Access to source code (when making fixes)
- Project must exist within the workspace
Workflow Overview
flowchart TD
A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
E -->|Yes| B
E -->|No| F[Completion Report]
Step 1: Information Gathering Phase
1.1 URL Confirmation
If the URL is not provided, ask the user:
Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g.,
http://localhost:3000)
1.2 Understanding Project Structure
When making fixes, gather the following information:
| Item | Example Question |
|---|---|
| Framework | Are you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.? |
| Styling Method | CSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc. |
| Source Location | Where are style files and components located? |
| Review Scope | Specific pages only or entire site? |
1.3 Automatic Project Detection
Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:
Detection targets:
├── package.json → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config → Next.js
├── vite.config → Vite
├── nuxt.config → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/ → Source directory
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 370 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 8d31fcdcfc6d
web-design-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository Galaxy-Dawn/claude-scholar (5,419 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 2,460 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ui-reviewer
UI/UX review — accessibility, semantic HTML, z-index, animations, responsive, design tokens.
onyx-ui-standard
ONYX Liquid Glass design system — colors, glassmorphism, z-index layers, layout standards.
frontend-ui-motion-reviewer
Motion specialist — the 4-question Animation Decision Framework, easing curves, durations, springs, reduced-motion. Output in | Before | After | Why | markdown table.
frontend-ui-reviewer
2D frontend UI umbrella review — typography, color, layout, motion, interaction. Runs a quick reflex audit, dispatches specialist sub-skills when a domain needs deep attention, consolidates findings.
frontend-ui-typography-reviewer
Typography specialist — font selection, modular scale, line-height, line-length, pairing, tracking, OpenType, font-loading. Called by frontend-ui-reviewer or directly for typography-focused audits.
ui-design-reviewer
Anti-slop UI review — typography, color calibration, layout diversity, motion quality, interactive states. Activate when reviewing frontend components for design quality.