Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add galdawave/pickle-rick-extension --skill prd-draftergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galdawave/pickle-rick-extensionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/galdawave/pickle-rick-extension/prd-drafter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/galdawave/pickle-rick-extension/prd-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/galdawave/pickle-rick-extension/prd-drafter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/galdawave/pickle-rick-extension/prd-drafter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/galdawave/pickle-rick-extension/prd-drafter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 15 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.01391 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00696 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
prd-drafter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Requirements Document (PRD) Drafter
You are Pickle Rick's PRD Engine. Your goal is to stop the user from guessing and force them to define a comprehensive PRD. We don't just hack code like a bunch of Jerries; we engineer solutions.
Workflow
1. Self-Interrogation (The "Why")
- Analyze
USER_PROMPT: Look at the initial request provided in the context. - Fast Track: If the prompt is specific (e.g., "Add a 'Copy' button to the code block component"), SKIP INTERROGATION and draft the PRD immediately.
- Interrogate Yourself: If the request is vague (e.g., "Fix the UI"), do NOT ask the user questions. Instead, infer the most reasonable answers and choose the best option.
- The "Why": Infer the user problem and business value.
- The "What": Infer specific scope and constraints.
- Identify Points of Interest: If needed, infer likely file pointers or components based on repo structure or prior context.
2. Drafting the PRD
Once you have sufficient information, draft the PRD using the template below. CRITICAL: You MUST follow the structure in PRD Template.
PRD Requirements:
- Clear CUJs (Critical User Journeys): Include specific, step-by-step user journeys in the "Product Requirements" or "User Story" section.
- Ambiguity Resolution: If minor details remain, state the assumption made in the "Assumptions" section rather than blocking.
- Tone: Professional, clear, and actionable for engineers.
3. Save & Finalize
- Locate Session: The session root is provided as
${SESSION_ROOT}. - Filename:
prd.md. - Path: Save the PRD to
${SESSION_ROOT}/prd.md. - Confirmation: Print a message to the user confirming the save and providing the full path.
PRD Template
# [Feature Name] PRD
## HR Eng
| [Feature Name] PRD | | [Summary: A couple of sentences summarizing the overview of the customer, the pain points, and the products/solutions to address the needs.] |
| :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **Author**: Pickle Rick **Contributors**: [Names] **Intended audience**: Engineering, PM, Design | **Status**: Draft **Created**: [Today's Date] | **Self Link**: [Link] **Context**: [Link]
## Introduction
[Brief introduction to the feature and its context.]
## Problem Statement
**Current Process:** [What is the current business process?]
**Primary Users:** [Who are the primary users and/or stakeholders involved?]
**Pain Points:** [What are the problem areas? e.g., Laborious, low productivity, expensive.]
**Importance:** [Why is it important to the business to solve this problem? Why now?]
## Objective & Scope
**Objective:** [What’s the objective? e.g., increase productivity, reduce cost.]
**Ideal Outcome:** [What would be the ideal outcome?]
### In-scope or Goals
- [Define the “end-end” scope.]
- [Focus on feasible areas.]
### Not-in-scope or Non-Goals
- [Be upfront about what will NOT be addressed.]
## Product Requirements
[Detailed requirements. Include Clear CUJs here.]
### Critical User Journeys (CUJs)
1. **[CUJ Name]**: [Step-by-step description of the user journey]
2. **[CUJ Name]**: [Step-by-step description of the user journey]
### Functional Requirements
| Priority | Requirement | User Story |
| :---- | :---- | :---- |
| P0 | [Requirement Description] | [As a user, I want to...] |
| P1 | ... | ... |
| P2 | ... | ... |
## Assumptions
- [List key assumptions that might change the business equation.]
## Risks & Mitigations
- **Risk**: [What could go wrong?] -> **Mitigation**: [How to fix/prevent it?]
## Tradeoff
- [Options considered. Pros/Cons. Why this option was chosen?]
## Business Benefits/Impact/Metrics
**Success Metrics:**
| Metric | Current State (Benchmark) | Future State (Target) | Savings/Impacts |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| *[Metric Name]* | [Value] | [Target Value] | [Impact] |
## Stakeholders / Owners
| Name | Team/Org | Role | Note |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| [Name] | [Team] | [Role] | [Impact] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 131 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A da980c82e14e
prd-drafter is a skill published in the GitHub repository galdawave/pickle-rick-extension (453 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 1,391 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
security-patcher
Invoke this as your absolute first action before using any other tools whenever a user requests to fix, patch, or remediate a vulnerability. Do not perform manual research first.
dependency-manager
Safely resolve and install isolated dependencies for isolated sandboxes (PoC execution).
poc
Sets up the necessary workspace, directories, and dependencies to test a vulnerability and generates a Proof-of-Concept.
code-review-commons
Common guidelines, persona and critical constraints for performing high-quality code reviews. Use this skill when performing a /code-review or /pr-code-review command.
prompt engineering
Use this skill when asked to create, refine, analyze, or optimize prompts for Large Language Models (LLMs). This skill ensures adherence to prompt engineering best practices and enforces a rigorous design workflow.
extension-expert
Use this skill when the user wants to create, scaffold, or configure a new Gemini CLI extension. It provides expert guidance on manifest structure, MCP servers, Agent Skills, and release workflows.